Back

Analyzing an organisms sensors using Maximum Entropy models with bias, variance, and confusion matrices

Wang, C.; Schimke, E.; Kako, T.; Gao, A.; Lamberti, M.; le Feber, J.; Marzen, S.

2026-01-12 biophysics
10.64898/2026.01.12.698979 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Biological organisms have sensors that communicate information about the environment. Analyzing how well these biological sensors function has usually been done with mutual information between the sensor signal and the environment, but that can be computationally intractable and summarize something quite complex with just a single number. We suggest that alternatively, one may profitably analyze these biosensors using bias and variance or confusion matrices, depending on the kind of environment. Stimulus-dependent Maximum Entropy models are used to develop estimators of the environmental state given the sensor state, and these estimators in turn are then used to calculate either the bias and variance of the estimator or confusion matrices. We focus on several examples to understand the utility of non-information-based analyses: ligand-receptor binding models spanning genetic regulation to neuronal communication to bacterial chemotaxis, and spin-glass Ising models for neural activity in cultured neurons. These new computationally-efficient analyses add insight to existing analyses based on mutual information; in particular, mutual information estimates give one number to characterize responses to all environmental inputs, and this analysis method characterizes how sensors respond to each environmental input. Categorical analyses, meanwhile, indicate the presence of memory without much prediction in confusion matrix elements in cultured neural networks, adding to previous understanding from mutual information estimates. Author summaryAll living organisms use external stimuli to navigate their environment via their sensors. Because encoding information costs energy, organisms retain only a fraction of the information received from their sensors, ideally information that maximizes their ability to remember past environmental states or predict future ones, key functions that support survival. To better understand how well sensor systems absorb stimulus information, we used stimulus-dependent Maximum Entropy (MaxEnt) models with maximum likelihood estimation and typical statistical metrics, such as confusion matrices or bias and variance. This approach provides two primary benefits over previous approaches: it is more computationally efficient, and it provides a more information-rich picture on how sensors interact with stimulus.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
22.7%
2
Physical Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.8%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 18%
10.2%
50% of probability mass above
4
Physical Review E
95 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.9%
5
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.6%
7
European Biophysics Journal
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
8
Journal of Theoretical Biology
144 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.1%
9
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
10
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
11
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 45%
1.5%
12
Entropy
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
13
BioSystems
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
14
Neural Computation
36 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
15
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
16
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
17
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
18
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
84 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
19
ACS Synthetic Biology
256 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
20
Bioinformatics Advances
184 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
21
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
22
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 29%
0.8%
23
Integrative And Comparative Biology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
24
Journal of the Royal Society Interface
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.6%
25
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.6%
26
Biosystems
18 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.5%
27
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.5%
28
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.5%
29
Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
30
Chaos, Solitons & Fractals
32 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%