Back

Bias correction for integrated climate projection modeling

Bigman, J. S.; Kearney, K. A.; Holsman, K. K.

2026-01-14 ecology
10.64898/2026.01.12.698884 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Projections of future conditions from Earth systems models (ESMs) are necessary to understand and predict effects of changing environmental conditions on biological systems. Such projections suffer from biases, or mismatches between model output and observations. While adjusting or bias-correcting model output is common, many methods exist with little understanding of their effects on forecasts of biological change. Here, we explore the bias-correction process and its effects on downstream predictive biological models. As an example, we use the Bering 10K, a downscaled ESM for a productive and economically important subarctic ecosystem. We first characterize existing biases for three categories of variables exhibiting different scales and challenges: bottom temperature, sea ice, and net primary production. We then apply eight bias-correction approaches to six indices generated from the three categories and quantify sources of uncertainty in the trajectories of these ecosystem variables. Finally, we demonstrate how different bias-correction approaches affect downstream biological models using three case studies: 1) fish thermal spawning habitat suitability, (2) predicted zooplankton abundance, and (3) match-mismatch of phytoplankton and zooplankton bloom timing. We find that biases manifest in absolute values over time and in the timing of seasonal events. Time series of all six indices differed depending on bias-correction method, differences that were propagated to downstream biological models. For a given year and simulation, depending on method, thermal spawning habitat suitability and zooplankton abundance differed up to 149% and 151%, and match-mismatch increased or did not change. Our work highlights that bias correction reduces mismatches between observations and model output but choosing an approach requires careful consideration as to not amplify and propagate bias in downstream biological models. To that end, we identify best practices for bias correcting global or regional ESMs, including a decision tree to help improve forecasts of the effects of climate change on biological systems.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Environmental Research Letters
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.7%
2
Ecography
50 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.2%
3
Global Change Biology
69 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.9%
4
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.9%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 28%
6.4%
6
Ecological Modelling
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
7
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 8%
4.0%
8
Ecological Applications
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
9
Ecological Informatics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.8%
10
Communications Earth & Environment
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.4%
11
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
12
Global Ecology and Biogeography
41 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
13
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.8%
14
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
15
Ecological Indicators
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
16
Journal of Biogeography
37 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
17
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.3%
18
GeoHealth
10 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
19
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
20
Journal of Ecology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
21
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
22
Journal of Thermal Biology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
23
Limnology and Oceanography: Methods
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
24
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 57%
0.8%
25
Movement Ecology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
26
Ecology
70 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
27
Conservation Letters
11 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
28
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
84 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
29
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
30
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 47%
0.6%