Back

MicroRNA spatial profiling for assessing drug efficacy in BRCA1-related triple-negative breast tumors

Mohd, O. N.; Wang, L.; Sardella, B. R.; Jou, D.; Wulf, G. M.; Slack, F.; Heng, Y. J.; Doyle, P. S.

2026-01-12 biochemistry
10.64898/2026.01.12.698824 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Abstract textBRCA1/2-mutated breast cancers exhibit homologous recombination deficiency (HRD), making them initially sensitive to poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors. However, 40-70% of patients develop resistance, necessitating combination strategies and predictive biomarkers. We first investigated approaches to overcome PARP resistance and then explored spatial microRNA (miRNA) profiling as a prognostic tool. Using the K14-Cre Brca1f/fTrp53f/f model with tumors that acquired PARP resistance, we evaluated PARP inhibitor combinations with either PI3K inhibition or Poly(I:C) in vivo. Both combinations improved antitumor activity compared to PARP inhibition alone. Next, to predict resistance we applied a sensitive assay that quantifies and spatially profiles miRNA expression in situ onto FFPE sections from tumors treated for 10 days using nanoliter well arrays with functionalized hydrogel posts. We developed a spatial miRNA analysis framework integrating latent Dirichlet allocation (LDA) and principal component analysis (PCA) to develop "topics" that stratify early tumors as either PARP inhibitor-sensitive or - resistant and distinguish their treatment regimens. We also incorporated immune architecture using Structural Similarity Index Measure (SSIM) maps that revealed co-localization of immune infiltration and miRNA topics. This integrative approach highlights how miRNA-based spatial analysis can predict PARP inhibitor resistance and provide a promising biomarker to inform therapeutic strategies for BRCA1/2-related breast cancers.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.