Back

Simultaneous quantification of drugs in whole blood by ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry using solid-phase mini-cartridges (Smart-SPE) for sample preparation

Suzuki, T.; Judai, N.; Ishihara, M.; Kajimoto, K.

2026-01-15 forensic medicine
10.64898/2026.01.12.26343926 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveDrug poisoning cases due to overdoses of over-the-counter (OTC) medications are increasing, and comprehensive measurement of blood drug concentrations, including OTC drugs, is important in emergency medicine and forensic science. In this study, we developed a simultaneous quantification method for blood drug levels using LC-MS/MS with solid-phase mini-cartridge SmartSPE for sample preparation. MethodsThe target analytes were acetaminophen, caffeine, flunitrazepam, 7-aminoflunitrazepam, risperidone, and phenobarbital. Internal standards (IS) used were acetaminophen-d4, caffeine-d9, diazepam-d5, and phenobarbital-d5. For solid-phase extraction, three types of Smart-SPE columns (AiSTI Science Co., Ltd.) were employed. 100 {micro}L of blank whole blood samples were subjected to protein precipitation using methanol and acetonitrile, and the supernatant obtained after centrifugation was processed using Smart-SPE for sample cleanup. Chromatographic separation was performed on a CAPCELL PAK INERT ADME-HR column (Osaka Soda), and detection was carried out in both positive and negative ESI modes. ResultsLinearity was observed for all drugs across the therapeutic to coma-death concentration ranges, with correlation coefficients exceeding 0.99 in all cases. Intra-day accuracy ranged from 98.06% to 110.87%, with precision between 0.19% and 17.37%. Inter-day accuracy ranged from 97.82% to 112.35%, with precision between 0.53% and 9.18%. Recovery rates varied from 72.9% to 95.1%, and matrix effects ranged from 91.2% to 113.0%. DiscussionThe validation results demonstrated satisfactory performance for all analytes, suggesting that this simultaneous quantification method may serve as a reliable analytical approach. Further investigations into sample stability are planned, and if analyses of actual specimens confirm its applicability, the method can be reported as a novel approach for simultaneous quantification of blood drug levels using a new sample pretreatment technique.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.0%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 14%
13.0%
3
Talanta
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.1%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 32%
3.8%
5
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.8%
6
Analytica Chimica Acta
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
7
Analytical Chemistry
205 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
2.9%
8
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.7%
9
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.7%
50% of probability mass above
10
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.2%
11
Sensors
39 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.8%
12
Journal of Virological Methods
36 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
13
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
14
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
15
Data in Brief
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.6%
16
Journal of Proteome Research
215 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
17
Food Chemistry
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
18
Water Research
74 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
19
Chemosphere
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
20
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
21
Biosensors and Bioelectronics
52 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
22
Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications
78 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
23
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.9%
24
Biology Open
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
25
The Analyst
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
26
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.8%
27
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
28
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
29
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
28 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
30
Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%