Integration of genomic classification and clinical characteristics predicts survival in metastatic prostate cancer
Schoen, M.; Li, J.; Zeng, S.; Desai, H.; Hausler, R.; Haroldsen, C.; Owens, L.; Valle, L.; Etzioni, R.; Rebbeck, T. R.; Rose, B.; Kelley, M.; Montgomery, R. B.; Nickols, N.; Rettig, M.; Yamoah, K.; Maxwell, K.; Garraway, I. P.
Show abstract
PurposeTumor comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) has revolutionized cancer care and identifies patients for biomarker-specific therapy. In metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC), CGP is not currently prognostic and no DNA-based genomic classification exists that accounts for combinations of alterations. We developed a DNA-based CGP classification that is prognostic for overall survival (OS) and could inform treatment. MethodsRetrospective cross-sectional study using multivariable models to develop a clinico-genomic prognostic risk classification in U.S. Veterans diagnosed with synchronous mHSPC. Primary outcome was overall survival (OS) from time of metastatic diagnosis. Results7201 Veterans with metastatic prostate cancer who underwent CGP were identified. There were 2484 Veterans (median [IQR] age 72 [67-77] years) with synchronous mHSPC and tissue CGP, which were divided into training and testing datasets. 16 genes associated with survival were identified and favorable, intermediate, and unfavorable genomic prognostication groups were created based upon mortality risk to generate the STRATOS-P classification. In a multivariable model, classification into intermediate and unfavorable groups was associated with increased mortality relative to the favorable group (aHR 1.54 [95% CI 1.33-1.78]; aHR 2.37 [95% CI 1.97-2.485], respectively), demonstrating an average AUC of 0.83. In an external validation cohort of non-Veterans, intermediate and unfavorable classifications were associated with increased mortality (aHR 2.45 [95% CI 1.87-3.21]; aHR 4.37 [95% CI 3.06-6.22], respectively) with an AUC of 0.79. The intermediate and unfavorable genomic prognostication groups were also associated with increased mortality across multiple disease states including synchronous and metachronous diagnoses, castration-resistance, and analyte type. ConclusionsIn metastatic prostate cancer, tumor DNA genomic alterations are prognostic for OS. The STRATOS-P classification is a validated prognostic tool that has the potential to guide decision-making in mHSPC.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- PSMA+ Extracellular Vesicles are a Biomarker for SABR in Oligorecurrent Prostate Cancer Analysis from the STOMP-like and ORIOLE trial cohorts 95%
- A Subset of Localized Prostate Cancer Displays an Immunogenic Phenotype Associated with Losses of Key Tumor Suppressor Genes 94%
- Assessment of Androgen Receptor splice variant-7 as a biomarker of clinical response in castration-sensitive prostate cancer 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Circulating Tumor-Derived Extracellular Vesicles Predict Clinical Outcomes in 11C Choline-identified Oligometastatic Castration-Refractory Prostate Cancer Treated with Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy 93%
- Association Between Artificial Intelligence-Derived Tumor Volume and Oncologic Outcomes for Localized Prostate Cancer Treated with Radiation Therapy 90%
- Risk of Clonal Hematopoiesis of Indeterminate Potential after Cancer Radiation Therapy 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Low abundance of circulating tumor DNA in localized prostate cancer 92%
- Clinical activity of Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase (MAPK) inhibitors in patients with MAP2K1 (MEK1)-mutated metastatic cancers 88%
- Germline testing data validate inferences of mutational status for variants detected from tumor-only sequencing 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Digital Spatial Profiling identifies phospho-JNK as a biomarker for early risk stratification of aggressive prostate cancer 91%
- The expression of PKM1 and PKM2 in developing, benign, and cancerous prostatic tissues 90%
- 5hmC-profiles in Puerto Rican Hispanic/Latino men with aggressive prostate cancer 90%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.