Back

Integration of genomic classification and clinical characteristics predicts survival in metastatic prostate cancer

Schoen, M.; Li, J.; Zeng, S.; Desai, H.; Hausler, R.; Haroldsen, C.; Owens, L.; Valle, L.; Etzioni, R.; Rebbeck, T. R.; Rose, B.; Kelley, M.; Montgomery, R. B.; Nickols, N.; Rettig, M.; Yamoah, K.; Maxwell, K.; Garraway, I. P.

2026-01-13 oncology
10.64898/2026.01.12.26343673
Show abstract

PurposeTumor comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) has revolutionized cancer care and identifies patients for biomarker-specific therapy. In metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC), CGP is not currently prognostic and no DNA-based genomic classification exists that accounts for combinations of alterations. We developed a DNA-based CGP classification that is prognostic for overall survival (OS) and could inform treatment. MethodsRetrospective cross-sectional study using multivariable models to develop a clinico-genomic prognostic risk classification in U.S. Veterans diagnosed with synchronous mHSPC. Primary outcome was overall survival (OS) from time of metastatic diagnosis. Results7201 Veterans with metastatic prostate cancer who underwent CGP were identified. There were 2484 Veterans (median [IQR] age 72 [67-77] years) with synchronous mHSPC and tissue CGP, which were divided into training and testing datasets. 16 genes associated with survival were identified and favorable, intermediate, and unfavorable genomic prognostication groups were created based upon mortality risk to generate the STRATOS-P classification. In a multivariable model, classification into intermediate and unfavorable groups was associated with increased mortality relative to the favorable group (aHR 1.54 [95% CI 1.33-1.78]; aHR 2.37 [95% CI 1.97-2.485], respectively), demonstrating an average AUC of 0.83. In an external validation cohort of non-Veterans, intermediate and unfavorable classifications were associated with increased mortality (aHR 2.45 [95% CI 1.87-3.21]; aHR 4.37 [95% CI 3.06-6.22], respectively) with an AUC of 0.79. The intermediate and unfavorable genomic prognostication groups were also associated with increased mortality across multiple disease states including synchronous and metachronous diagnoses, castration-resistance, and analyte type. ConclusionsIn metastatic prostate cancer, tumor DNA genomic alterations are prognostic for OS. The STRATOS-P classification is a validated prognostic tool that has the potential to guide decision-making in mHSPC.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 60%
7.4%
2
Nature Communications
based on 483 papers
Top 13%
6.2%
3
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
based on 14 papers
Top 0.2%
5.7%
4
Frontiers in Oncology
based on 34 papers
Top 2%
5.2%
5
eLife
based on 262 papers
Top 4%
4.9%
6
British Journal of Cancer
based on 22 papers
Top 1%
4.4%
7
Cancer Medicine
based on 17 papers
Top 0.8%
4.4%
8
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 44%
4.4%
9
JCO Precision Oncology
based on 11 papers
Top 0.2%
4.4%
10
International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
based on 13 papers
Top 0.7%
4.4%
50% of probability mass above
11
Clinical Cancer Research
based on 22 papers
Top 1%
4.4%
12
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
based on 13 papers
Top 0.2%
4.4%
13
Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
based on 14 papers
Top 0.8%
2.9%
14
Cancers
based on 57 papers
Top 4%
2.7%
15
JAMA Network Open
based on 125 papers
Top 8%
2.4%
16
npj Precision Oncology
based on 14 papers
Top 1%
2.4%
17
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
based on 14 papers
Top 1%
2.3%
18
International Journal of Cancer
based on 18 papers
Top 0.8%
2.3%
19
Journal of Clinical Investigation
based on 50 papers
Top 2%
1.5%
20
BMC Cancer
based on 21 papers
Top 3%
1.5%
21
Breast Cancer Research
based on 11 papers
Top 1%
1.3%
22
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
based on 100 papers
Top 11%
1.2%
23
Neuro-Oncology Advances
based on 14 papers
Top 2%
0.8%
24
The American Journal of Human Genetics
based on 77 papers
Top 7%
0.7%
25
eBioMedicine
based on 82 papers
Top 9%
0.7%
26
Human Genetics and Genomics Advances
based on 39 papers
Top 4%
0.7%
27
Diagnostics
based on 36 papers
Top 6%
0.7%
28
Journal of Translational Medicine
based on 21 papers
Top 3%
0.7%
29
iScience
based on 74 papers
Top 9%
0.7%