Back

Boundary Vector Cells Encode a Future-Biased Spectrum of Positions in the Rat

Newman, E. L.; Mashanova-Galikova, I.; Tiganj, Z.; Lever, C.

2026-01-12 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.01.11.698891 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Spatial tuning is a hallmark property of neural firing in the hippocampal formation. Yet, that tuning is often less well correlated with the instantaneous current position of an animal than it is with an integrated version of the past or future state of the animal. Whether that encoding is biased towards past or future states and the extent to which it shows fixed versus multi-scale encoding varies across circuits and cell types. The temporal encoding properties of boundary vector cells of the subiculum are not well established. To address this here, we re-analyzed recordings of BVCs described previously by Lever et al. (2009) with multiple approaches. In the first, we asked if adding a temporal offset between the rat position and the spiking of a BVC increased the apparent spatial tuning in the firing rate map. We found that aligning BVC spiking with future states maximized the rate map spatial tuning. These results were mirrored in a second analysis that, instead of optimizing rate map spatial tuning, optimized how well the firing rate map predicted the BVC spiking. The second analysis also allowed us to ask whether that encoding is focused on a particular temporal horizon or whether the encoding captures behavior at multiple scales. To this end, for a given recording, we asked "How much time-integration of the behavioral state is the observed spiking most consistent with?" We observed a wide spectrum of time-constants of integration across cells, indicating that BVCs form a multiscale encoding of future states. The distribution of both offsets and integration rates observed across BVCs did not differ significantly from other, non-BVC, subiculum neurons. Taken together, these findings indicate that BVCs, along with other subiculum neurons, form a multi-scale encoding of future states.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Hippocampus
46 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
67.1%
50% of probability mass above
2
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.7%
3
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.0%
4
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 30%
2.8%
5
Frontiers in Neural Circuits
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.5%
6
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 26%
1.5%
7
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 19%
1.4%
8
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.4%
9
Cerebral Cortex
357 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
10
Neurobiology of Learning and Memory
35 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
11
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 21%
0.9%
12
Journal of Neurophysiology
263 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
13
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 42%
0.8%
14
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
15
Neural Networks
32 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
16
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 73%
0.8%
17
Behavioral Neuroscience
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
18
Brain Structure and Function
83 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
19
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 63%
0.7%
20
Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
19 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
21
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
22
Neuron
282 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.7%