Back

DREADD agonist Clozapine-N-oxide, but not Compound 21, impairs spatial memory encoding

Bunce, B.; Vankampen, A. A.; He, A.; Aton, S. J.; Raven, F.

2026-01-12 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.01.11.698821 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Chemogenetic studies using Designer Receptors Exclusively Activated by Designer Drugs (DREADDs) enable the precise manipulation of neuronal activity in specific brain regions and cell types. DREADDs are widely used to dissect neural circuits underlying animal behavior, including learning and memory. Clozapine-N-Oxide (CNO), a metabolite of clozapine and one of the earliest-developed ligands for muscarinic DREADDs, was initially considered pharmacologically inert. However, CNO is now known to undergo back-metabolism to clozapine, leading to undesired off-target behavioral effects, including alterations in locomotion and anxiety-related behaviors. New ligands such as Compound 21 (C21) have been developed to improve selectivity and reduce these effects. However, despite their widespread use, no studies to date have directly compared the effects of CNO and C21 themselves on specific cognitive processes such as hippocampus-dependent memory formation. Here, we measured acute effects of CNO and C21 on spatial memory encoding, using an object-location memory (OLM) paradigm in male and female mice. We also quantified encoding-associated hippocampal principal neuron and parvalbumin (PV+) interneuron activity by measuring cFos expression in these populations. Across dorsal hippocampal subregions, neither ligand altered overall neuronal activity nor PV+ interneuron activity during encoding. Nonetheless, we find that CNO administration impairs OLM encoding, while C21 does not. Together, these findings highlight a previously unrecognized behavioral effect of CNO administration on hippocampus-dependent memory formation--even in the absence of DREADD expression--and indicate that C21 may be a preferable ligand for chemogenetic studies examining memory and hippocampal function.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Neuropsychopharmacology
134 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
40.8%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 7%
9.5%
50% of probability mass above
3
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 19%
4.5%
4
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 24%
2.7%
5
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.4%
6
Neurobiology of Aging
95 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.0%
7
ACS Chemical Neuroscience
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
8
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 23%
1.7%
9
Journal of Neurochemistry
50 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
10
Cell Chemical Biology
81 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
11
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
46 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.4%
12
Behavioural Brain Research
70 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.4%
13
International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.4%
14
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 21%
1.3%
15
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
16
Neuropharmacology
60 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
17
Molecular Psychiatry
242 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
18
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 59%
0.9%
19
Biological Psychiatry Global Open Science
54 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
20
The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
21
Behavioral Neuroscience
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
22
Addiction Biology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
23
Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
24
Neuroscience Letters
28 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
25
European Journal of Neuroscience
168 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
26
Hippocampus
46 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
27
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.7%
28
ACS Pharmacology & Translational Science
40 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
29
Psychopharmacology
59 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.5%
30
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 72%
0.5%