Artificial Intelligence-Guided Design of CAR-T Cells for Solid Tumors through CD-Antigen Prioritization, Safety-by-Design Architectures, and Constrained Large Language Model Reasoning
TASTAN, C.; AYDIN, B.
Show abstract
Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy has achieved transformative success in hematological malignancies, yet its extension to solid tumors remains constrained by antigen heterogeneity, limited tumor infiltration, immunosuppressive tumor microenvironments, and on-target/off-tumor toxicity. Addressing these challenges requires integrative design strategies that simultaneously optimize antigen selection, receptor architecture, and safety constraints. Here, we present an artificial intelligence (AI)-guided, end-to-end computational framework for rational CAR-T design in solid tumors that unifies CD-antigen prioritization, safety-by-design CAR architectures, constrained large language model (LLM)-assisted evidence synthesis, and statistical feature validation. The framework operates across four sequential stages. First, structured CD-antigen knowledge, immune functional annotations, surface topology, and tumor-associated expression descriptors are integrated into a multi-criteria antigen prioritization scheme, enabling stratification of targets into high-confidence, conditional, and unsafe classes. Second, prioritized antigens are algorithmically mapped to safety-constrained CAR architectures, including logic-gated, modular, and armored designs that explicitly mitigate off-tumor toxicity and functional exhaustion. Third, multiple LLMs are benchmarked under standardized prompts and quantitative scoring rubrics to evaluate architectural convergence, safety awareness, factual grounding, and translational feasibility. Fourth, correlation analysis and unsupervised clustering of antigen feature spaces identify functional redundancy and synergistic antigen combinations, directly informing rational multi-antigen CAR-T designs. Applying this framework reveals strong convergence of LLMs toward dual-antigen logic-gated and trafficking-enhanced CAR architectures for solid tumors, while also uncovering substantial model-dependent variability in safety rigor and hallucination risk. Statistical validation demonstrates that antigen suitability is an emergent, context-dependent property shaped by feature interactions rather than expression alone. By embedding AI within explicit biological constraints, quantitative validation, and human oversight, this work establishes a reproducible, auditable blueprint for translating heterogeneous biomarker data into safety-aware, experimentally testable CAR-T designs for solid tumors.
Matching journals
The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Tumor reactivity assessment using clonal expression (TRACE) reveals tumor reactive CD8+ T cell heterogeneity across solid tumors 91%
- Development and Validation of Multivariable Prediction Models of Serological Response to SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination in Kidney Transplant Recipients 90%
- IOBR: Multi-omics Immuno-Oncology Biological Research to decode tumor microenvironment and signatures 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Community Challenge for Pancancer Drug Mechanism of Action Inference from Perturbational Profile Data 90%
- Deep Learning identifies new morphological patterns of Homologous Recombination Deficiency in luminal breast cancers from whole slide images. 90%
- Bexmarilimab-induced macrophage activation leads to treatment benefit in solid tumors: the phase I/II first-in-human MATINS trial 90%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Predictive value of preclinical models for CAR-T cell therapy clinical trials: a systematic review and meta-analysis 92%
- TCCIA: A Comprehensive Resource for Exploring CircRNA in Cancer Immunotherapy 91%
- Tumor-agnostic transcriptome-based classifier identifies spatial infiltration patterns of CD8+ T cells in the tumor microenvironment and predicts clinical outcome in early- and late-phase clinical trials 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.