Back

Evoked Connectivity of Cortical Stimulation for Memory

Cole, E. R.; DeHaan, R.; Blanpain, L. T.; Laxpati, N. G.; Sakon, J. J.; Sheth, S.; Zaghloul, K. A.; Jobst, B. C.; Sperling, M.; Lega, B.; Worrell, G.; Kahana, M. J.; Gross, R. E.

2026-01-13 neurology
10.64898/2026.01.10.26343861 medRxiv
Show abstract

Despite promising results, it remains unclear how to optimally target and personalize closed-loop stimulation to ameliorate deficits in memory and other cognitive functions. We hypothesized that evoked connectivity - the measurement of neural pathway activation using single pulses of electrical stimulation - can guide patient-specific selection of stimulation location and parameters for memory. We characterized brain-wide evoked connectivity profiles of stimulation in memory-related brain regions recorded from 81 patients undergoing intracranial monitoring for epilepsy, showing that greater evoked connectivity between the lateral temporal cortex and the broader memory network (including the mesial temporal lobe, limbic regions and prefrontal cortex) corroborates observations of memory improvement by lateral temporal cortex stimulation. We first found that the lateral temporal cortex, compared to other stimulated regions, evokes the greatest and most distributed connectivity response throughout other memory-related regions. Evoked connectivity in downstream regions is greatest when stimulating a previously identified optimal target for memory improvement, bordering white matter at the rostrocaudal center of the middle temporal gyrus. Evoked connectivity corroborates other biomarkers of memory improvement by closed-loop stimulation, including increased resting-state functional connectivity between stimulated and recorded sites and increased modulation of oscillatory power. These results provide insight into the network mechanisms of stimulation for memory and suggest that evoked connectivity can more broadly predict the functional effects of closed-loop stimulation to prospectively guide targeting and parameter selection.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.