Back

Rational Design and Effectiveness Analysis of Pediatric Medication Pathways under DRG/DIP Payment Models

Yi, P.; Zhu, C.; Wan, M.; Wang, B.; Peng, D.; Tang, X.

2026-01-13 health economics
10.64898/2026.01.10.26343843 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveTo evaluate the impact of implementing pediatric medication pathways on operational management under the DRG/DIP payment model in a specialized childrens hospital, using DRG as a case study. MethodsAll medical records with DRG codes DT13 and GW15 from 2023 (pre-implementation control group) and 2024 (post-implementation observation group) were included. A systematic comparative analysis of clinical data was performed to assess the effects on hospital operational metrics. ResultsThe observation group exhibited a significantly lower average cost per case (DT13: 17.82%; GW15: 26.05%) and a higher medical insurance payment margin (DT13: {yen}186,500; GW15: {yen}89,000) compared to the control group. The examination cost proportion and total hospitalization expenses decreased significantly (P < 0.05), whereas the drug cost proportion showed a non-significant decreasing trend (P > 0.05). Regarding efficiency, the average length of stay and number of drug varieties were significantly reduced (P < 0.05). Quality indicators, including antibiotic usage rate, antibiotic use intensity, and adverse drug reaction incidence, were significantly improved (P < 0.05), alongside an increased rational prescription review rate. Furthermore, the number of high-cost cases decreased while low-cost cases increased for both disease groups post-implementation, with all case distributions remaining within clinically acceptable bounds. ConclusionPediatric medication pathways represent an effective strategy for balancing cost-containment with the unique clinical demands of pediatric care within the DRG/DIP framework. They provide a practical reference for precision management in pediatric hospitals and empirical evidence to inform pediatric-sensitive medical insurance payment policies.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.