Back

Rational Design and Effectiveness Analysis of Pediatric Medication Pathways under DRG/DIP Payment Models

Yi, P.; Zhu, C.; Wan, M.; Wang, B.; Peng, D.; Tang, X.

2026-01-13 health economics
10.64898/2026.01.10.26343843
Show abstract

ObjectiveTo evaluate the impact of implementing pediatric medication pathways on operational management under the DRG/DIP payment model in a specialized childrens hospital, using DRG as a case study. MethodsAll medical records with DRG codes DT13 and GW15 from 2023 (pre-implementation control group) and 2024 (post-implementation observation group) were included. A systematic comparative analysis of clinical data was performed to assess the effects on hospital operational metrics. ResultsThe observation group exhibited a significantly lower average cost per case (DT13: 17.82%; GW15: 26.05%) and a higher medical insurance payment margin (DT13: {yen}186,500; GW15: {yen}89,000) compared to the control group. The examination cost proportion and total hospitalization expenses decreased significantly (P < 0.05), whereas the drug cost proportion showed a non-significant decreasing trend (P > 0.05). Regarding efficiency, the average length of stay and number of drug varieties were significantly reduced (P < 0.05). Quality indicators, including antibiotic usage rate, antibiotic use intensity, and adverse drug reaction incidence, were significantly improved (P < 0.05), alongside an increased rational prescription review rate. Furthermore, the number of high-cost cases decreased while low-cost cases increased for both disease groups post-implementation, with all case distributions remaining within clinically acceptable bounds. ConclusionPediatric medication pathways represent an effective strategy for balancing cost-containment with the unique clinical demands of pediatric care within the DRG/DIP framework. They provide a practical reference for precision management in pediatric hospitals and empirical evidence to inform pediatric-sensitive medical insurance payment policies.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Medical Economics
based on 10 papers
Top 0.1%
15.9%
2
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 35%
13.7%
3
PLOS Global Public Health
based on 287 papers
Top 7%
6.6%
4
Frontiers in Public Health
based on 135 papers
Top 6%
4.9%
5
BMJ Open
based on 553 papers
Top 24%
4.7%
6
BMC Health Services Research
based on 43 papers
Top 0.8%
4.7%
50% of probability mass above
7
Journal of Medical Internet Research
based on 81 papers
Top 4%
4.7%
8
Genetics in Medicine
based on 57 papers
Top 2%
3.1%
9
Annals of Translational Medicine
based on 14 papers
Top 1%
2.5%
10
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 64%
2.3%
11
BMC Medicine
based on 155 papers
Top 10%
1.9%
12
Frontiers in Pediatrics
based on 24 papers
Top 2%
1.6%
13
Cureus
based on 64 papers
Top 10%
1.6%
14
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
based on 116 papers
Top 14%
1.6%
15
BMC Public Health
based on 148 papers
Top 17%
1.4%
16
European Radiology
based on 11 papers
Top 2%
1.4%
17
Healthcare
based on 14 papers
Top 1%
1.4%
18
BMC Medical Education
based on 16 papers
Top 1%
1.4%
19
Psychiatry Research
based on 33 papers
Top 4%
1.4%
20
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
based on 18 papers
Top 1%
1.2%
21
JAMA Network Open
based on 125 papers
Top 15%
1.2%
22
One Health
based on 15 papers
Top 0.9%
1.2%
23
Journal of Public Health
based on 23 papers
Top 3%
0.8%
24
Nutrients
based on 43 papers
Top 5%
0.7%
25
Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease
based on 14 papers
Top 1.0%
0.7%
26
eClinicalMedicine
based on 55 papers
Top 6%
0.7%