A Community-Based Integrated Partnership Approach to Living Well with Dementia: Evaluating the Impact of the Sage House Model
King, R. L.; Warren, S.; Vass, E.; Sharpe, B. T.; Beaumont, K.; Seymour, S.; Bell, S.; Pereira, A.
Show abstract
A key societal priority is to support people with dementia and their care partners to live well, particularly through improved access to high-quality information, continuity of care, and consistent post-diagnostic support. The Sage House Model represents a novel, community-based approach to integrated dementia care, co-locating diagnostic assessment, tailored support services, psychosocial interventions, and opportunities for social engagement within a single accessible centre. By reducing fragmentation across health, social care, and voluntary sector provision, the model is designed to address key determinants of living well with dementia. The present study examined whether the Sage House Model is associated with key wellbeing outcomes for both people with dementia and care partners. Using a natural experiment design, outcomes were compared between participants accessing the Sage House centre in Tangmere and those receiving standard care. The sample included 135 people with dementia (Mage = 74.64, SD = 8.30) and 129 care partners (Mage = 67.23, SD = 9.84). A series of ANCOVAs indicated that people with dementia accessing Sage House reported significantly higher quality of life (p = .004, {omega}2 = .06), life satisfaction (p = .004, {omega}2 = .07), and wellbeing (p = .044, {omega}2 = .03) compared with those receiving standard care. In addition, care partners with access to Sage House reported significantly greater needs-based QoL, particularly in relation to improved access to information and support (p = .005, {omega}2 = .07). These findings provide initial empirical support for community-based integrated dementia care in enhancing wellbeing for people with dementia and their care partners, and highlight the value of co-located, multicomponent dementia services in addressing post-diagnostic gaps in real-world care.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The facilitators and barriers to improving functional activity and wellbeing in people with dementia: A qualitative study from the Process Evaluation of Promoting Activity, Independence and Stability in Early Dementia 95%
- Process evaluation of a New psychosocial goal-setting and manualised support intervention for Independence in Dementia (NIDUS-Family) 94%
- Frailty is a predictor of medication-related harm requiring healthcare utilisation: a multicentre prospective cohort study 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Patterns of long-term care utilization during the last five years of life among Swedish older adults with and without dementia 95%
- Randomized Clinical Trial of ICECaP (Individualized Coordination and Empowerment for Care Partners of Persons with Dementia): Primary Mental Health and Burden Outcomes 94%
- Aging in Place - A mixed methods study protocol of how care providers in Sweden organise and adapt granted home care services to the preferences and needs of people living with dementia 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Needs of key stakeholders to make advance care plans and advance directives for people with dementia - A scoping review 96%
- Deconditioning in people living with dementia during the COVID-19 pandemic: findings from the Promoting Activity, Independence and Stability in Early Dementia (PrAISED) process evaluation 96%
- Carers using assistive technology in dementia care: an explanatory sequential mixed methods study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- How, Why And Under What Circumstances Does A Quality Improvement Collaborative Build Knowledge And Skills In Clinicians Working With People With Dementia? A Realist Informed Process Evaluation 93%
- Exploring the potential of geospatial mapping of emergency call data to improve ambulance services for older adults: a feasibility study in the South Central region of England 93%
- An observational study of survival outcomes of people referred for ‘fast-track’ end-of-life care funding in a District General Hospital; too little too late? 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.