PARP1 recruits SPRTN to DNA-protein crosslinks through a conserved poly-ADP-ribose binding domain.
Hurley, K.; Leary, L. P.; Garcia, M.; Rahman, A.; Schaich, M. A.; Kloet, M. S.; Kumi-Ansah, F.; Blade, E. G.; Liu, Q.; Rhiner, A.; Le, M.; Simonson, Q.; Filippov, D. V.; van der Heden van Noort, G. J.; McLellan, J. S.; Van Houten, B.; Lopez-Mosqueda, J.
Show abstract
DNA-protein crosslinks (DPCs) are toxic DNA lesions formed by the covalent attachment of proteins to DNA. Failure to resolve DPCs leads to genomic instability, premature aging, and cancer predisposition. Although multiple proteases and the 26S proteasome degrade DPCs, how these lesions are detected and marked for proteolysis remains unclear. Here, we show that poly-(ADP-ribose) polymerases (PARP1/2) sense DPCs and modify them with poly(ADP-ribose) (PAR) to promote repair via a SPRTN-Tdp1 axis. We discovered a Nudix homology domain (NHD) in SPRTN that mediates direct non-covalent PAR binding and is important for DPC repair. Loss of PARP1/2 activity or mutation of the SPRTN NHD leads to sustained DPCs. Single-molecule analysis revealed that SPRTN does not bind efficiently to the DPC, however after the addition of PARP1 in the presence of NAD+, SPRTN binding to the DPC was significantly increased. Our findings establish PARP1/2 enzymes as immediate DPC sensors, reveal PARylation as a signal marking DPCs for SPRTN-dependent degradation, and identify SPRTN as the first PARP-directed protease.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Simultaneous measurement of biochemical phenotypes and gene expression in single cells 97%
- UPF1 mutants with intact ATPase but deficient helicase activities promote efficient nonsense-mediated mRNA decay 96%
- Cooperativity between Cas9 and hyperactive AID establishes broad and diversifying mutational footprints in base editors 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.