Sex-stratified insights into the genetics of brain volumes in late adulthood
Breton, E.; Tissink, E.; Matte Bon, G.; van der Meer, D.; Andreassen, O.; Kaufmann, T.
Show abstract
BackgroundThe prevalence, timing and disease course of mental and neurological disorders vary according to sex, yet the neurogenetic mechanisms underlying sex differences in these disorders remain poorly understood. Methods. Here, we explored the genetic architecture of the anatomical volumes of 257 regions of interest across the brain using multivariate genome-wide analyses in 15,740 male and 15,740 female participants from the UK Biobank, matched on age and scan site. ResultsOur findings revealed that the genetics of brain volume is highly similar between females and males in late adulthood. Yet, we found evidence of possible autosomal sex heterogeneity, particularly in the number of brain-volume associated genes, which was higher in females than in males. Variability in the number of identified genes were marked in limbic regions such as the insula, the cingulate cortex, the hippocampus and the amygdala. Conclusion.Overall, our findings contribute to a better understanding of the genetic determinants of brain volumes in males and females. Because neurogenetics may also influence the risk for sex-prevalent brain disorders, the current findings have the potential to facilitate precision medicine approaches in improving prevention strategies and targeted treatments. Plain English summaryMental and neurobiological disorders often differ between females and males. Some disorders are more common in one sex than the other, and symptoms can present or evolve differently. Variation in brain biology, partly shaped by genetic factors, may contribute to these observed patterns. In this study, we investigated genetic factors linked to brain structure in females and males separately. We focused on the volumes of 257 brain regions and analyzed genetic data from more than 30,000 adults from the UK Biobank. Overall, we found that the patterns of association between genetics and brain volumes are largely similar between females and males in late adulthood. At the same time, we observed evidence of sex-dependent patterns, particularly in the number of genes associated with brain volume, which tended to be higher in females than in males. These differences were marked in brain regions involved in the limbic system. Together, our findings improve our understanding of how genetics contribute to brain structure in females and males. HighlightsGenetic influences on brain volumes are largely shared between females and males in late adulthood. Gene-level variability was observed, with a higher number of brain volumes associated genes identified in females than in male, in both multivariate and univariate analyses. This gene-level variability was most pronounced in limbic regions, such as the insular and cingulate cortices.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Brain-Wide Mendelian Randomization Study of Anxiety Disorders and Symptoms 95%
- The Genetic Architecture of Amygdala Nuclei 95%
- Early or late gestational exposure to maternal immune activation alters neurodevelopmental trajectories in mice: an integrated neuroimaging, behavioural, and transcriptional study 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Gene dosage effects of 22q11.2 copy number variants on in-vivo measures of white matter axonal density and dispersion 94%
- Genetic control of variability in subcortical and intracranial volumes 94%
- Replicability of Structural Brain Alterations Associated with General Psychopathology: Evidence from a Population-Representative Birth Cohort 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Genome-wide association study of body fat distribution traits in Hispanics/Latinos from the HCHS/SOL Study 92%
- Shared loci of telomere length with brain morphology, and pleiotropy in transcriptomic and epigenomic profiles of brain 92%
- Evaluating and implementing block jackknife resampling Mendelian randomization to mitigate bias induced by overlapping samples 92%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.