Back

Feather corticosterone is not associated with feather growth rate or quality across tropical and temperate passerines, but possibly linked to elevation

Kauzal, O.; Tomasek, O.; Horak, K.; Kotasova-Adamkova, m.; Kauzalova, T.; Chi, J. E.; Mani, F. T.; Hochmanova, Z.; Simek, Z.; Albrecht, T.

2026-01-09 ecology
10.64898/2026.01.09.698619 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Moult is a challenging stage in the life of birds. Small passerines replace plumage, substantial part of their body mass, annually to preserve its vital functions. Surprisingly, most species tend to downregulate corticosterone, major mediator of energy metabolism and stress response, during this energetically demanding period. Experimental studies suggest corticosterone has detrimental effect on feather quality and, within species, slows feather growth rate (FGR), prolonging the period when plumage functions are compromised. However, how exactly corticosterone affects moult in natural populations or on macroecological scale is not yet fully understood. In this study, we analysed corticosterone deposited in tail feathers (fCORT), a corticosterone cumulative measure across multiple days relevant to the moult, on an unprecedented sample of 87 passerine species from Europe and Afrotropics. Our data showed moderate between and high within-species repeatability, strengthening the usefulness of fCORT as a tress record across multiple species. We did not find any association of fCORT with either FGR or fault bar occurrence. Unlike circulating corticosterone, fCORT did not differ between latitudes. However, our data suggested higher fCORT in high elevation tropical species. More research is needed to understand how birds regulate corticosterone during moult and how it affects moult in natural populations.

Published in Journal of Vertebrate Biology · not in our set (fewer than 10 published preprints to learn from) · training set

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.