Multimodal Imaging-Based Targeting Approach for Network-Level Brain Stimulation
Shahbabaie, A.; Abdelmotaleb, M.; Kocatas, H.; Niemann, F.; Antonenko, D.; Floeel, A.; Meinzer, M.
Show abstract
BackgroundNeural network effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) are poorly understood. Here, we introduce an empirically informed, multimodal functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) based framework suited for guiding stimulation target selection and hypothesis-based data analysis in focal tDCS-fMRI studies. MethodsWe illustrate our approach using data of 37 healthy individuals (19 females; mean {+/-} SD age = 25.8 {+/-} 5.9) recruited from a multicenter tDCS-fMRI study. Participants completed resting-state (RS- and task-fMRI (object-location memory, OLM, or associative picture-pseudoword learning, APPL, experiments) with placebo tDCS. Seed-based RS data analysis identified the functional networks originating from project-specific target regions for focal tDCS (right occipito-temporal cortex, rOTC; left ventral IFG, lvIFG) and also established their test-retest reliability using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Dice coefficients analyzed the overlap between the seeded RS- and task-evoked networks. This aimed to identify task-active regions potentially affected by downstream neural network effects from the target regions. ResultsSeed-based analyses identified two highly reliable ventral visual-limbic (rOTC) and language-related networks (lvIFG), with >72-77% of voxels showing good-to-excellent TRR (ICC [≥] 0.75). Only a subset of voxels identified by the RS analyses overlapped with activity elicited by the experimental paradigms (ranging from 7.5-55%), with larger correspondence for the OLM task (Dice OLM: 0.249-0.349; APPL 0.065-0.106). Therefore, the degree of potential tDCS network effects varied substantially depending on the target region, the extent of its functional network and task-specific activity patterns. Degree of correspondence was further mediated by the selected contrasts-of-interest in the task-based analyses, with more conservative control conditions resulting in reduced overlap. ConclusionWe established a principled, multimodal fMRI framework bridging a critical gap in neuromodulation research. By integrating reliable intrinsic connectivity maps with task-evoked activity patterns, we provide a method to prospectively identify network-level targets for focal brain stimulation and to generate hypotheses for data analyses in tDCS-fMRI studies. This approach paves the way for investigating modulation of specific functional networks, shifting the rationale from stimulating an isolated brain region to strategically targeting key nodes within a predefined functional pathway.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Semantic integration demands modulate large-scale network interactions in the brain 97%
- The transition from vision to language:distinct patterns of functional connectivity for sub-regions of the visual word form area 96%
- Relational integration demands are tracked by temporally delayed neural representations in alpha and beta rhythms within higher-order cortical networks 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- A set of functionally-defined brain regions with improved representation of the subcortex and cerebellum 97%
- Hippocampal and striatal responses during motor learning are modulated byprefrontal cortex stimulation 97%
- Effects of phase encoding direction on test-retest reliability of human functional connectome 97%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Test-Retest Reliability of Dynamic Functional Connectivity Parameters for a Two-State Model 97%
- The Motion Sensitivity and Predictive Utility of Different Estimates of Inter-regional Functional Coupling in Resting-state Functional MRI. 97%
- Static and Dynamic Aspects of Cerebro-Cerebellar Functional Connectivity are Associated with Self-reported Measures of Impulsivity: A Resting-State fMRI Study 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.