Harmonizing the stimulation dose of focal tDCS across target sites
Thielscher, A.; Hayek, D.; Puonti, O.; Grittner, U.; Blankenburg, F.; Fischer, R.; Hartwigsen, G.; Li, S.-C.; Meinzer, M.; Nitsche, M.; Timmann, D.; Floeel, A.; Antonenko, D.
Show abstract
Non-invasive brain stimulation is an established tool for modulating neural activity that holds promise for advancing both cognitive neuroscience and clinical interventions. Focal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), using center-surround electrode montages, enables more region-specific targeting. Although computational models can simulate individual electric fields, no existing approach enables the prospective individualization of electrode placement while standardizing the dose across targeted brain regions. In the current preparatory methodological study, we present a modeling-based framework that harmonizes the electric field strength between different target regions at the group level, but preserves inter-individual variability. This enables systematic examination of dose-response relationships and their regional differences. Positioning of the center-surround electrode montages is individualized to ensure focusing of the electric field on the target regions. We started by defining brain targets for eight cognitive and motor functions using MRI data from 43 participants. Using field simulations, we then estimated a group-average field strength in the target regions that had led to behavioral and physiological effects in prior tDCS studies (resulting in 0.2 V/m). The radii of the center-surround montages were optimized for each target region to achieve the intended field strength while maximizing focality. Validation in an independent sample (n=53) confirmed that the intended target field strength is achieved on average for new participants. The described computational tools are made available as open-source software, allowing other researchers to apply our individualization framework with parameters (target regions and target field strengths) tailored to their specific research questions; and are currently being implemented in a multi-center study involving approximately 1,000 datasets.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Effects of tDCS Dose and Electrode Montage on regional cerebral blood flow and motor behavior 97%
- State-dependent effectiveness of cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation on cortical excitability 96%
- Predictive modeling of TMS-evoked responses: Unraveling instantaneous excitability states 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- TI-Toolbox: An Open-Source Software for Temporal Interference Stimulation Research 96%
- Transferability of cathodal tDCS effects from the primary motor to the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex: a multimodal TMS-EEG study 96%
- Transcranial direct current stimulation elevates the baseline activity while sharpening the spatial tuning of the human visual cortex 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Electric field based dosing for TMS 96%
- Extracting Reproducible Components from Electroencephalographic Responses to Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation with Group Task-Related Component Analysis 96%
- Source Reconstruction Without an MRI using Optically Pumped Magnetometer based Magnetoencephalography 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- In the back of your mind: Cortical mapping of paraspinal afferent inputs 94%
- Are we really targeting and stimulating DLPFC by placing transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) electrodes over F3/F4? 94%
- Title: Reliability, sensitivity and predictive value of fMRI during multiple object tracking as a marker of cognitive training gain in combination with tDCS in stroke survivors 94%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.