Evaluating respiratory syncytial virus immunization strategies for infants in Canada: a cost-utility analysis
Gebretekle, G. B.; Lan, M.; Xi, M.; Ximenes, R.; Buchan, S. A.; Abrams, E.; Andrew, M. K.; Brousseau, N.; Killikelly, A.; Money, D.; Papenburg, J.; Rafferty, E.; ROBINSON, J.; Siu, W.; Tunis, M.; Tuite, A.
Show abstract
BackgroundRespiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a leading cause of lower respiratory tract infections and hospitalizations among infants in Canada. New long-acting monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and vaccines administered during pregnancy have expanded prevention options, yet the most cost-effective immunization program remains uncertain. MethodsWe updated a Canadian cost-utility model to evaluate seven seasonal RSV prevention strategies over one year (with a lifetime horizon for mortality impacts), from health system and societal perspectives. Strategies included RSVpreF vaccination in late pregnancy; targeted or universal infant mAb programs using nirsevimab or clesrovimab; and combination programs in which infants could receive protection from either RSVpreF or mAbs. Sequential incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were estimated in 2024 Canadian dollars per quality-adjusted life year (QALY), using a $50,000/QALY threshold. The primary analysis used immunization product list prices. FindingsThe most cost-effective strategy was a seasonal combination program: RSVpreF vaccination for pregnancies due during RSV season with mAb for infants at high risk (<32 weeks gestation), including catch-up for infants at high-risk born before the season. This strategy had an ICER of $35,408/QALY compared to seasonal mAb for infants at moderate risk (320/7 to 366/7 weeks gestation) or high-risk with catch-up. Expanding mAb to unimmunized non-high-risk infants born in-season increased the ICER to $132,131/QALY. Universal infant protection (mAb alone or combined with RSVpreF in pregnancy) was not cost-effective across analyses. RSVpreF alone was dominated. Results were most sensitive to product prices, target populations, age at administration, and RSV burden. ConclusionsA seasonal combination program with RSVpreF for in-season deliveries and mAb for infants at high-risk offers the best value for money for protecting Canadian infants from RSV disease. Broader infant immunization programs may be cost-effective with substantial price reductions or in regions with higher disease burden and healthcare costs.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Cost-effectiveness of RSVpreF vaccine and nirsevimab for the prevention of respiratory syncytial virus disease in Canadian infants 99%
- Optimal Respiratory Syncytial Virus intervention programmes using Nirsevimab in England and Wales 96%
- Projecting maximum potential demand for nirsevimab to protect eligible US infants and young children against respiratory syncytial virus in the 2024/2025 season 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Potential Clinical Impact of Implementing Different COVID-19 Boosters in Fall 2022 in the United States 92%
- Modeling the Cost-Effectiveness of the Next-Generation COVID-19 mRNA-1283 Vaccine in the United States 91%
- Public Health Impact of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine (BNT162b2) in the first year of rollout in the United States 91%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Optimizing next-generation RSV prevention in Mali: a cost-effectiveness analysis of pediatric vaccination, maternal vaccination, and extended half-life monoclonal antibody immunoprophylaxis 96%
- Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Alternative Infant and Neonatal Rotavirus Vaccination Schedules in Malawi 93%
- Contextualizing future maternal RSV vaccination acceptance and trust among pregnant and lactating women in Kenya: A latent class analysis 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Respiratory syncytial virus vaccination strategies for older Canadian adults: a cost-utility analysis 97%
- Real-world effectiveness of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir use for COVID-19: A population-based cohort study in Ontario, Canada 90%
- Progressive Increase in Virulence of Novel SARS-CoV-2 Variants in Ontario, Canada 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.