Back

Evaluating respiratory syncytial virus immunization strategies for infants in Canada: a cost-utility analysis

Gebretekle, G. B.; Lan, M.; Xi, M.; Ximenes, R.; Buchan, S. A.; Abrams, E.; Andrew, M. K.; Brousseau, N.; Killikelly, A.; Money, D.; Papenburg, J.; Rafferty, E.; ROBINSON, J.; Siu, W.; Tunis, M.; Tuite, A.

2026-01-11 health economics
10.64898/2026.01.09.26343789 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundRespiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a leading cause of lower respiratory tract infections and hospitalizations among infants in Canada. New long-acting monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and vaccines administered during pregnancy have expanded prevention options, yet the most cost-effective immunization program remains uncertain. MethodsWe updated a Canadian cost-utility model to evaluate seven seasonal RSV prevention strategies over one year (with a lifetime horizon for mortality impacts), from health system and societal perspectives. Strategies included RSVpreF vaccination in late pregnancy; targeted or universal infant mAb programs using nirsevimab or clesrovimab; and combination programs in which infants could receive protection from either RSVpreF or mAbs. Sequential incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were estimated in 2024 Canadian dollars per quality-adjusted life year (QALY), using a $50,000/QALY threshold. The primary analysis used immunization product list prices. FindingsThe most cost-effective strategy was a seasonal combination program: RSVpreF vaccination for pregnancies due during RSV season with mAb for infants at high risk (<32 weeks gestation), including catch-up for infants at high-risk born before the season. This strategy had an ICER of $35,408/QALY compared to seasonal mAb for infants at moderate risk (320/7 to 366/7 weeks gestation) or high-risk with catch-up. Expanding mAb to unimmunized non-high-risk infants born in-season increased the ICER to $132,131/QALY. Universal infant protection (mAb alone or combined with RSVpreF in pregnancy) was not cost-effective across analyses. RSVpreF alone was dominated. Results were most sensitive to product prices, target populations, age at administration, and RSV burden. ConclusionsA seasonal combination program with RSVpreF for in-season deliveries and mAb for infants at high-risk offers the best value for money for protecting Canadian infants from RSV disease. Broader infant immunization programs may be cost-effective with substantial price reductions or in regions with higher disease burden and healthcare costs.

Published in PLOS ONE (predicted rank #7) · training set

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.