Deployable high-fidelity metagenome binning at scale with QuickBin
Bushnell, B.; Villada, J. C.
Show abstract
1.Reconstructing genomes from metagenomic assemblies is foundational to microbiome research, yet metagenome binning remains constrained by a persistent trade-off between genome fidelity and deployable throughput. Many high-accuracy approaches rely on GPU-intensive workflows, marker-gene-informed postprocessing, or resource demands that limit reproducible use at catalog scale. Here we present QuickBin, a CPU-native, marker-free binning algorithm designed to recover near-complete, ultra-low-contamination metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs) under practical compute constraints. QuickBin couples a GC-coverage spatial index (BinMap) with a hierarchical, early-exit Oracle cascade of similarity tests (scalar composition/coverage filters followed by SIMD-accelerated k-mer comparisons), invoking a compact neural network only for the small fraction of ambiguous candidate merges. Across synthetic communities evaluated by both marker-based estimates and contig-origin ground truth, QuickBin yields high recovery while maximizing the fraction of sequence assigned to uncontaminated bins. In a benchmark of 297 diverse real metagenomes, QuickBin completed all runs and recovered more MAGs meeting [≥]95% completeness and [≤]1% contamination than widely used CPU binners and compute-intensive alternatives that frequently failed to finish under standardized limits. QuickBin provides a practical path to reproducible, high-fidelity genome-resolved metagenomics at scale for downstream comparative analyses and data products that depend on low-artifact genome reconstructions. The full software package is open-source and available for download at https://bbmap.org, GitHub repo (https://github.com/bbushnell/BBTools), or Docker container (https://hub.docker.com/r/bryce911/bbtools).
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.