Back

Ultrafast Frame-Free Imaging of Neural Activity with Event Cameras

Forli, A.; Kasuba, K. C.; Henn, K.; Lee, D.; Hernandez-Morales, M.; Liu, C.; Miller, E. W.; Yartsev, M.

2026-01-09 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.01.08.698496 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Frame-based fluorescence imaging has long defined how neural activity is optically measured. This approach requires acquiring all pixels within an image, regardless of whether they carry meaningful neural dynamics, thereby intrinsically coupling spatial and temporal resolution while increasing data output. Here, we introduce an entirely different, frame-free approach that leverages the sparse nature of neural activity using event-based cameras, which asynchronously report fluorescence changes as spatiotemporal events. Compared with a frame-based camera, our method preserves signal fidelity while eliminating the fixed trade-off between spatial resolution, temporal resolution and data rate, thereby reducing data output by orders of magnitude. Applied to hippocampal preparations we demonstrate that the frame-free approach can resolve both single action potentials and fast network dynamics over large fields of view at kilohertz rates, enabling scalable, ultrafast optical recordings.

Published in Current Biology (predicted rank #25) · training set

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Methods
○ 385 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
14.7%
Similar papers in this journal
2
Nature Communications
○ 5641 papers in training set
Top 16%
11.6%
Similar papers in this journal
3
Communications Biology
○ 993 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
9.4%
Similar papers in this journal
4
eLife
● 5828 papers in training set
Top 15%
7.7%
Similar papers in this journal
5
Neurophotonics
● 42 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.6%
Similar papers in this journal
50% of probability mass above
6
Scientific Reports
○ 3612 papers in training set
Top 17%
5.4%
7
Neuron
○ 337 papers in training set
Top 2%
5.0%
8
Cell Reports Methods
○ 165 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.9%
9
Science Advances
● 1243 papers in training set
Top 12%
3.1%
10
The Journal of Neuroscience
● 1025 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.7%
11
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
○ 122 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.6%
12
Cell Reports
○ 1498 papers in training set
Top 14%
2.6%
13
eneuro
● 439 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.4%
14
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
● 2444 papers in training set
Top 24%
2.1%
15
Nature Neuroscience
○ 252 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
16
iScience
○ 1154 papers in training set
Top 28%
1.1%
17
Nature
○ 645 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.1%
18
PLOS Biology
● 486 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.1%
19
PLOS ONE
● 5266 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.0%
20
Advanced Science
○ 286 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.8%
21
ACS Chemical Neuroscience
● 67 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
22
Nature Biomedical Engineering
○ 47 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
23
Frontiers in Neural Circuits
○ 43 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.