Back

Dual Inhibition of MYRF Cleavage by Its JM Region and PAN-1 CCT Gates Developmental Timing in C. elegans

Xu, Z.; Feng, X.; Lyu, H.; Yan, Y.-H.; Zhou, Y.; Wang, Z.; Bai, F.; Dong, M.-Q.; Qi, Y. B.

2026-01-09 developmental biology
10.64898/2026.01.08.698494 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Post-embryonic development proceeds through discrete stages, yet the mechanisms that coordinate transitions between stages remain incompletely defined. The transmembrane transcription factor MYRF undergoes intramolecular cleavage to release a nuclear-localized fragment essential for developmental progression in C. elegans. Previously, we showed that PAN-1 as a key partner required for MYRF activity during development. PAN-1 promotes MYRF trafficking to the cell membrane--an essential step for MYRF cleavage--through interactions between their extracellular domains (Xia et al., 2021). Here, we show that MYRF-1 cleavage and nuclear translocation oscillate with larval stage transitions in C. elegans, peaking mid-to-late stage and being suppressed during molts. Using endogenous gene editing and mutant reporters, we identify an uncharacterized juxtamembrane (JM) region in MYRF-1 that self-inhibits cleavage. JM deletion triggers premature MYRF-1 nuclear entry, early lin-4 activation, growth defects, and adult lethality. We further demonstrate that the cytoplasmic tail (CCT) of the transmembrane protein PAN-1 acts as a predominant trans-inhibitor of MYRF-1 cleavage, coupling extracellular association with cytoplasmic inhibition. PAN-1 CCT deletion causes near-constitutive MYRF-1 nuclear accumulation, leading to premature lin-4 activation, accelerated M-cell division, and larval lethality. Removing these inhibitory mechanisms on MYRF-1 cleavage overrides nutrient-responsive developmental checkpoints. These findings uncover dual inhibitory mechanisms governing MYRF-1 cleavage and establish MYRF-1 cleavage as a key gatekeeper of developmental timing.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.