Back

In-Depth Characterization of Stem Cell Potency and Genotoxicity for Clinical-Scale Ex Vivo CRISPR/Cas9 Gene Editing

Naseem, A.; Vetharoy, W.; Whittaker, T. E.; Zinghirino, F.; Ghosh, R.; Gomez Castaneda, E.; Ali, H.; Cipriani, C.; Montini, E.; Thrasher, A. J.; Santilli, G.; Cesana, D.; Turchiano, G.; Cavazza, A.

2026-01-09 molecular biology
10.64898/2026.01.08.698401 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Translating CRISPR/Cas9-based homology-directed repair (HDR) strategies into clinical application remains a major challenge due to limited standardization, concerns over safety, and efficacy issues. Here, we present a comprehensive and clinically compliant preclinical framework for the ex vivo correction of Wiskott-Aldrich Syndrome (WAS) using a CRISPR/Cas9-AAV6 platform targeting hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs). In this study, we established a clinical-compatible platform enabling large-scale manufacturing while preserving HSPC viability, stemness, and multilineage functionality. To overcome low HSPC long-term engraftment, we fine-tuned AAV dosing and transiently modulated p53 signalling, achieving significantly improved in vivo correction and repopulation. Importantly, we implemented a multi-tiered genotoxicity assessment strategy, integrating in silico, genome-wide, and orthogonal assays, revealing a largely favorable safety profile with minimal off-target risks and no signs of clonal dominance or transformation. Longitudinal in vivo safety monitoring revealed donor specific rare off-target events and structural variants. This highlights the crucial importance of patient monitoring after transplantation, further emphasized by the identification of a de novo chromosomal rearrangements that could be detected exclusively following cell engraftment in mice. This work offers a robust and adaptable roadmap for future HDR-based gene editing platforms, establishing critical benchmarks for efficacy, safety, and regulatory readiness in the development of advanced therapeutic medicinal products.

Published in Molecular Therapy Advances · not in our set (fewer than 10 published preprints to learn from) · training set

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.