Human lung explants as a predictive platform for evaluating the on-target, off-tumor toxicity of T cell bispecifics
Tschan, M.; Jetzer, T.; Obenloch, M.; Blank, A.; Yong, C.; Nair, N.; Cabon, L.; DArcangelo, E.; Lutolf, M.
Show abstract
T cell bispecifics (TCBs) are potent immunotherapies with proven efficacy in hematological cancers but limited success in solid tumors, where on-target, off-tumor toxicity has restricted their therapeutic index. Clinical discontinuation of TCB formulations against epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM TCB, Solitomab) and preclinical termination of a TCB against folate receptor alpha (FolR1-TCB) highlight the urgent need for predictive preclinical models to evaluate such toxicities. Conventional models, including cell lines and organoids, lack the immune and stromal complexity of the tumor microenvironment (TME), and while patient-derived explants preserve native tissue architecture and heterogeneity, quantification of TCB-mediated target cell killing has not been previously achieved in this system. Here, we establish a human lung explant model to assess TCB activity in matched tumor and normal adjacent tissues. Using a multi-modal approach combining flow cytometry, cytokine profiling, and multiplexed immunofluorescence, we show that EpCAM and FolR1 TCBs drive robust T cell activation and, critically, quantifiable epithelial cell killing above background levels. Normal lung explants exhibited consistently higher levels of killing than tumor counterparts, reflecting the on-target, off-tumor toxicities observed preclinically and clinically with the tested TCBs. In contrast, colon explants displayed poor viability ex vivo, limiting their suitability for assessing TCB-induced killing despite measurable immune activation. Our findings establish lung explants as a predictive and clinically relevant preclinical model that uniquely enables simultaneous quantification of TCB-mediated T cell activation and target cell killing. This model captures key features of TCB mechanism of action and recapitulates clinically observed toxicities, supporting its application for preclinical evaluation of TCB drug candidates and advancing the development of immunotherapies for solid tumors.
Matching journals
The top 14 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Th17 cells contribute to combination MEK inhibitor and anti-PD-L1 therapy resistance in KRAS/p53 mutant lung cancers 95%
- Inhibiting Stromal Class I HDACs Curbs Pancreatic Cancer Progression 94%
- Cancer associated fibroblast subtypes modulate the tumor-immune microenvironment and are associated with skin cancer malignancy 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Hypoxia-Sensing CAR T-Cells Provide Safety and Efficacy in Treating Solid Tumors 95%
- Functional diagnostics using fresh uncultured lung tumor cells to guide personalized treatments 94%
- Bexmarilimab-induced macrophage activation leads to treatment benefit in solid tumors: the phase I/II first-in-human MATINS trial 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- CD300e is a driver of the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment and colorectal cancer progression via macrophage reprogramming 95%
- Combination of oncolytic Maraba virus with immune checkpoint blockade overcomes therapy resistance in an immunologically cold model of advanced melanoma with dysfunctional T cell receptor signalling. 94%
- Tumor-agnostic transcriptome-based classifier identifies spatial infiltration patterns of CD8+ T cells in the tumor microenvironment and predicts clinical outcome in early- and late-phase clinical trials 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Long-term maintenance of patient-specific characteristics in tumoroids from six cancer indications in a common base culture media system 96%
- Combining Plasma Extracellular Vesicle Let-7b-5p, miR-184 and Circulating miR-22-3p Levels for NSCLC Diagnosis and Drug Resistance Prediction 94%
- A Novel Cell Therapy for COVID-19 and Potential Future Pandemics: Virus Induced Lymphocytes (VIL) 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.