Architecting cis-regulation to quantitatively tune gene expression in cereals
Groover, E. D.; Ding, D.; Wang, F. Z.; Benegas, G.; Rivera, J.; Schwartz, S.; Chen, S.; Moubarak, M. F.; Georgieva, V.; Lemaux, P. G.; Staskawicz, B.; Niyogi, K. K.; Song, Y. S.; Savage, D.
Show abstract
Precise modulation of gene expression via cis-regulatory editing holds promise for non-transgenic crop improvement, but the sequence-to-function relationships that govern plant promoter activity remain poorly understood. Here, we develop a massively parallel reporter assay (MPRA) in Sorghum bicolor to systematically measure the effects of >30,000 CRISPR-like mutations-deletions, substitutions, and motif insertions-across entire native promoters and 5' untranslated regions (UTRs) of three photosynthesis genes: PsbS, Raf1, and SBPase. We find that gene expression is most tunable within a [~]500 base pair core promoter region, where mutational effects are reproducible across biological replicates and predictive of protein output. Within these regions, we identify compact deletions and motif insertions that strongly increase protein production (>30-fold relative to wild type), exceeding the performance of transgenic enhancer elements. Mutation-effect relationships are gene-specific, highlighting the need for tailored regulatory maps. Our results establish a high-throughput strategy for cis-regulatory fine-mapping that enables crop improvements via minimal, precise, and non-transgenic gene edits.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- MaizeCODE reveals bi-directionally expressed enhancers that harbor molecular signatures of maize domestication. 98%
- CRISPR targeting of H3K4me3 activates gene expression and unlocks centromere-proximal crossover recombination in Arabidopsis 98%
- START domains generate paralog-specific regulons from a single network architecture 97%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.