Reciprocal Environmental Decision Support (REDS): better tailored advice in return for data
Kenward, B.; Casey, N.; Bastid, P.; Buner, F.; Buffam, I.; Ewald, J.; Kenward, R.
Show abstract
O_LIEnvironmental Decision Support systems use models to make tailored predictions about local circumstances based on user input. Citizen Science systems accept contributions about local circumstances to improve models. Each system type emphasises data flow in one direction: system to user or user to system, respectively. C_LIO_LIWe introduce a new system type that synergises data flows in both directions. Reciprocal Environmental Decision Support (REDS) systems process user-contributed information to (1) provide tailored predictions and (2) improve the model that generates the advice. We assessed existing decision support systems and found no REDS system for ecosystem management. C_LIO_LIFor our proof-of-concept REDS system, Garden Advice, we began with an initial Bayesian species-habitat association model (for the House Sparrow Passer domesticus) and solicited data from UK residents about habitat structure and sparrow observations in domestic gardens. The model made predictions about sparrow presence, and effects of planned garden changes, while updating parameter estimates based on contributed data, generally becoming more confident. One salient parameter update likely reflects reality (a positive association with grass), while another (a reduced association with roof proximity) likely reflects observation bias. C_LIO_LICross-validated comparison indicated that the final model predicted the solicited data better than the original model. Thus, untrained observers can provide data of sufficient quality to refine a model already parameterised with trained observer data. Notwithstanding important questions about distinguishing observation bias from ecologically meaningful information, our system demonstrates that important synergies can be obtained from the REDS approach. Later users of the system obtained better advice thanks to contributions from earlier users and automated Bayesian updating. C_LI Lay SummaryA summary for non-specialists is available at https://bit.ly/reds_brochure.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- PointedSDMs -- an R package to help facilitate the construction of integrated species distribution models 94%
- Accounting for spatial interactions in the upscaling of ecosystem services 94%
- Thinking like a naturalist: enhancing computer vision of citizen science images by harnessing contextual data 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- A workflow for microclimate sensor networks: integrating geographic tools, statistics, and local knowledge 96%
- TwinEco: A Unified Framework for Dynamic Data-Driven Digital Twins in Ecology 95%
- The Broken Window: An algorithm for quantifying and characterizing misleading trajectories in ecological processes 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Bayesian species distribution models integrate presence-only and presence-absence data to predict deer distribution and relative abundance. 94%
- Predicting fine-scale distributions and emergent spatiotemporal patterns from temporally dynamic step selection simulations 93%
- Modelling species presence-only data with random forests 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Bayesian areal disaggregation regression to predict wildlife distribution and relative density with low-resolution data 94%
- Land-use history causes differences in park nighttime cooling capacity and forest structure 92%
- Fitting individual-based models of spatial population dynamics to long-term monitoring data 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.