Back

Study protocol for estimating modern US social contact patterns: the ENGAGED study

Shiiba, M.; Bruck, M.; Sesay, M. M.; Hudgins, A. F.; Segall, M. F.; Prasad, P.; Doran, C. R.; Siegler, A. J.; Lobelo, F.; Ryerson, A. B.; Lopman, B.; Nelson, K. N.; Ahmed, S. M.

2026-01-11 epidemiology
10.64898/2026.01.08.26343704 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundAccurately capturing social contact data is essential for developing effective mathematical models to forecast disease trends and evaluate interventions. There are limited population-based data of social contacts in the United States (US) which limits our ability to accurately model infectious disease transmission. MethodsTo fill in this gap, we conducted a staggered longitudinal cohort study in metropolitan Atlanta, Georgia, USA. We aimed to characterize contact patterns and examine how they varied by i) participant demographics, ii) seasonality, and iii) self-managed and medically-attended symptoms. Once per month for six months, participants reported individual contacts they can name, individual contacts they cannot name, and contacts that occurred in group settings. We defined individual contacts as a two-way conversation with five or more words in the physical presence of another person or physical skin-to-skin contact, and group contacts as contacts with a group of people with whom participants talked, interacted, or shared space. Participants were enrolled on a rolling basis, and data is collected from November 2024 through April 2026. Data analysis will generate age-specific contact matrices using individual contacts and compare contact rates by symptoms. We will also analyze the number and characteristics (e.g. indoor/outdoor) of each type of contacts. The contact matrices and results will be publicly available for the wider modeling community. DiscussionThis study is among the first population-level longitudinal studies of social contact patterns in the US. By capturing behavioral changes during periods of both health and illness, and across seasons, this study will provide insights into the complex dynamics of human behavior relevant to infectious disease transmission in the US.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.