Study protocol for estimating modern US social contact patterns: the ENGAGED study
Shiiba, M.; Bruck, M.; Sesay, M. M.; Hudgins, A. F.; Segall, M. F.; Prasad, P.; Doran, C. R.; Siegler, A. J.; Lobelo, F.; Ryerson, A. B.; Lopman, B.; Nelson, K. N.; Ahmed, S. M.
Show abstract
BackgroundAccurately capturing social contact data is essential for developing effective mathematical models to forecast disease trends and evaluate interventions. There are limited population-based data of social contacts in the United States (US) which limits our ability to accurately model infectious disease transmission. MethodsTo fill in this gap, we conducted a staggered longitudinal cohort study in metropolitan Atlanta, Georgia, USA. We aimed to characterize contact patterns and examine how they varied by i) participant demographics, ii) seasonality, and iii) self-managed and medically-attended symptoms. Once per month for six months, participants reported individual contacts they can name, individual contacts they cannot name, and contacts that occurred in group settings. We defined individual contacts as a two-way conversation with five or more words in the physical presence of another person or physical skin-to-skin contact, and group contacts as contacts with a group of people with whom participants talked, interacted, or shared space. Participants were enrolled on a rolling basis, and data is collected from November 2024 through April 2026. Data analysis will generate age-specific contact matrices using individual contacts and compare contact rates by symptoms. We will also analyze the number and characteristics (e.g. indoor/outdoor) of each type of contacts. The contact matrices and results will be publicly available for the wider modeling community. DiscussionThis study is among the first population-level longitudinal studies of social contact patterns in the US. By capturing behavioral changes during periods of both health and illness, and across seasons, this study will provide insights into the complex dynamics of human behavior relevant to infectious disease transmission in the US.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Study protocol for the Innovative Support for Patients with SARS-COV-2 Infections Registry (INSPIRE): a longitudinal study of the medium and long-term sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection 95%
- Comprehensive profiling of social mixing patterns in resource poor countries: a mixed methods research protocol 95%
- Feasibility and lessons learned on remote trial implementation from TestBoston, a fully remote, longitudinal, large-scale COVID-19 surveillance study 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Time trends in social contacts before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: the CONNECT study 94%
- Quantifying Contact Patterns in Response to COVID-19 Public Health Measures in Canada 93%
- Structural racism and COVID-19 response: Higher risk of exposure drives disparate COVID-19 deaths among Black and Hispanic/Latinx residents of Illinois, USA 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cohort Profile: A national prospective cohort study of SARS-CoV-2 pandemic outcomes in the U.S. - The CHASING COVID Cohort Study 95%
- Risk factors, symptom reporting, healthcare-seeking behaviour and adherence to public health guidance: protocol for Virus Watch, a prospective community cohort study 94%
- Tracking Persistent Symptoms in Scotland (TraPSS): A Longitudinal Prospective Cohort Study of COVID-19 Recovery After Mild Acute Infection 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Human Epidemiology and RespOnse to SARS-CoV-2 (HEROS): Objectives, Design and Enrollment Results of a 12-City Remote Observational Surveillance Study of Households with Children using Direct-to-Participant Methods 95%
- Missing data and missed infections: Investigating racial and ethnic disparities in SARS-CoV-2 testing and infection rates in Holyoke, Massachusetts 93%
- Collaborative Cohort of Cohorts for COVID-19 Research (C4R) Study: Study Design 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.