Pooling quantitative MRI data: A multi-protocol study of healthy subcortical ageing
Zubkov, M.; Pine, K.; Bazin, P. L.; Talwar, P.; Mortazavi, N.; Dauby, S.; Geron, C.; Beckers, E.; Lamalle, L.; Phillips, C.; Collette, F.; Maquet, P.; Lommers, E.; Alkemade, A.; Weiskopf, N.; Vandewalle, G.; Kirilina, E.
Show abstract
Quantitative MRI (qMRI) measures relaxation rates, exchange rates and proton densities that reflect biophysical properties of tissue and are ideally free from protocol- and scanner-dependence. In practice, qMRI has not yet achieved this level of independence from sequence and hardware choice, and quantitative estimates often differ across sites and acquisition schemes. At the same time pooling data across different sources can be beneficial to statistical power of longitudinal, cross-sectional or case-control studies. Here we investigate how protocol and hardware differences can affect pooling data from different sources in large ultra high field (UHF) qMRI studies in the context of healthy aging. We combine the openly available ageing UHF qMRI MP2RAGEME-based dataset with two different MPM-based sets of qMRI data. We evaluate how pooling affects age dependence of qMRI parameters and investigate protocol-related biases, with a particular focus on subcortical structures. We focus the analysis, first, on replication and expansion of the reference qMRI dataset on normative aging, second, the examination of the protocol influence on the estimated qMRI values, and third, on detecting the protocol effect on the age dependence inferred from the data. We find that the age-related changes for R1 measure around 4-17% of the lifespan mean in different structures. Similarly, age-related R2* variation in different structures constitutes around 6-30%. Subcortical structure volume change is on the order of 5-27%. We further observe larger relative difference between protocols for R1 and volume, while R2* remains more consistent for most regions. We show how pooling the UHF qMRI data from different sites and collected with different quantitative protocols can be both detrimental and beneficial for the analysis outcomes.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Combining Navigator and Optical Prospective Motion Correction for High-Quality 500 μm Resolution Quantitative Multi-Parameter Mapping at 7T 97%
- Neuroanatomical underpinning of diffusion kurtosis measurements in the cerebral cortex of healthy macaque brains 96%
- Ultrafast fMRI detects age-related changes in harmonics of cardiac pulsations in the brain at 7 T 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Spatiotemporal patterns of cortical microstructural maturation in children and adolescents with diffusion MRI 96%
- The impact of multiband and in-plane acceleration on white matter microstructure analysis 96%
- Comparison of structural MRI brain measures between 1.5T and 3T: data from the Lothian Birth Cohort 1936 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Brain Iron Imaging Markers in the Presence of White Matter Hyperintensities 96%
- Influence of preprocessing, distortion correction and cardiac triggering on the quality of diffusion MR images of spinal cord 95%
- Estimation of in-scanner head pose changes during structural MRI using a convolutional neural network trained on eye tracker video 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.