Back

A molecular framework of chromatin extrusion in plants

Tzourtzou, S.; Wang, Z.; Leuchtenberg, S.; latrasse, D.; Benhamed, M.; Liu, C.

2026-01-09 genomics
10.64898/2026.01.07.698229 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Three-dimensional genome organization is a fundamental regulator of gene expression, yet the mechanisms shaping higher-order chromatin folding in plants remain poorly defined. Here, we identify the Arabidopsis cohesin regulator PDS5A as a central modulator of chromatin loop extrusion and topologically associating domain (TAD)-like architecture. Using Hi-C and Micro-C, we show that loss of PDS5A strongly enhances TAD-like domains and nucleosome-scale stripes and loops across chromosome arms, while leaving large-scale compartmentalization largely intact and revealing conserved TAD-like patterns across tissues and ploidy levels. Genetic analyses indicate that Arabidopsis TAD-like domain formation relies on the plant-specific kleisin SYN4 and is antagonized by WAPL1/2, with PDS5A acting as the dominant cohesin-unloading factor that limits loop extension. Biochemical experiments demonstrate that PDS5A physically associates with cohesin and that its function in suppressing TAD-like domains is independent of direct Tudor domain-mediated binding to H3K4me1-marked chromatin. Micro-C further resolves that chromatin loop and stripe anchors formed in pds5a are highly enriched at accessible, strongly transcribed promoters and are marked by the plant site II motif TGGGCC/T, implicating site II-binding transcription factors as plant-specific boundary elements analogous to CTCF in animals. Finally, mutational disruption of distal chromatin anchors shows that newly formed chromatin contacts in pds5a can act as cis-regulatory modules that influence target gene expression. Together, these findings identify a PDS5A-regulated chromatin extrusion module that shapes plant 3D genome architecture and uncover a promoter- and motif-based logic for loop anchoring and transcriptional control in plants.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.