Back

A Unified and Interpretable Framework for Evaluating Fluorescence Trace Quality in Transcription Kinetics

Xing, Y.; Lu, W.-T.; Liu, J.; Zou, Z.; Zhou, R.; Wang, H.; Yang, Y.; Yao, Y.; Yang, Q.; Xu, X.; Zhou, H.

2026-01-08 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.01.07.698175 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Quantifying transcriptional dynamics from fluorescence traces is a powerful approach to understanding gene regulation, but such analysis critically depends on the quality of the fluorescence signal. Experimental researchers often lack an objective and computationally simple way to assess trace quality before kinetic modeling. In this study, we fill in this gap via systematically investigating two key factors (i.e., signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and trace length) using synthetic data generated from a composite-state Hidden Markov Model (cpHMM) simulator. By analyzing thousands of simulated traces, we identified quantitative thresholds (SNR [≥] 30 dB and length [≥] 360) beyond which transcriptional dynamics can be reliably captured for kinetic inference. Building on these findings, we further discovered a unified and easily computable quality indicator based on the difference between the first two autocorrelation lags. A threshold value of approximately 0.07 effectively separates reliable from low quality traces, providing a simple yet robust criterion for data selection. Together, these results establish a practical framework for assessing fluorescence trace reliability, offering experimental researchers an interpretable and computationally efficient tool to ensure data quality prior to transcription kinetics modeling.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.6%
2
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
10.7%
3
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 3%
10.3%
4
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 1%
7.3%
5
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 5%
7.0%
6
Journal of Bioinformatics and Systems Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.0%
50% of probability mass above
7
Physical Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.3%
8
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
214 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.7%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 34%
3.7%
10
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.5%
11
Briefings in Bioinformatics
326 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
12
Analytical Chemistry
205 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
13
Quantitative Biology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
14
ACS Synthetic Biology
256 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
15
Physical Review E
95 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.3%
16
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.3%
17
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
18
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.0%
19
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
158 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
20
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.9%
21
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.7%
22
in silico Plants
24 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
23
Journal of Molecular Biology
217 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
24
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.5%
25
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
207 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
26
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 23%
0.5%
27
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 40%
0.5%
28
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%