Back

Novel model combining intrinsic and learned behaviours captures divergent effects of dopaminergic drugs on different types of motivation

Bartlett, M.; Furlong, P. M.; Stewart, T. C.; Orchard, J.; Jackson, M. G.

2026-01-08 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.01.07.698166 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Motivation-based symptoms occur in an array of neurological and neurodegenerative disorders, including Schizophrenia and Parkinsons Disease. Unfortunately, there is, as yet, no agreed treatment approach. To establish a better understanding of motivation, and so highlight potential avenues for treatment, motivation is often investigated using operant behavioural paradigms such as the Effort for Reward (EfR) task. Performance on these tasks is thought to be influenced by reinforcement learning (RL) mechanisms, such that disorders of motivation can be described in terms of altered interactions with RL processes. Recently, foraging behaviour has been increasingly adopted as an ethologically valid approach to investigating cognitive mechanisms, including motivation. One example of this is the recently developed Effort Based Foraging task (EBF). Foraging behaviour, unlike the strictly controlled and contrived operant behavioural paradigms, involves a series of complex behavioural processes, each potentially driven by different cognitive processes. It is therefore important to identify which portion of the foraging behavioural sequence is driven by the same RL mechanisms as classical operant behavioural paradigms, and therefore can be used to investigate motivation. In this work we set out to establish whether the same RL mechanisms could be used to account for behaviours observed in both EfR and EBF tasks. We identified where, within the EBF task, RL mechanisms were no long sufficient and developed a novel hybrid model of the behaviour. This model successfully accounted for external influences on motivation, including previously unpredicted effects of clinically used dopaminergic drugs. This work reveals that motivation in complex, naturalistic tasks cannot be fully explained by learning-based models alone. Incorporating intrinsic behavioural drives may be needed as neuroscience moves toward more ethological behavioural assays.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
46 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.2%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 8%
9.0%
3
Behavioural Brain Research
70 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.3%
4
Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
5
European Journal of Neuroscience
168 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
6
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
7
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.8%
8
Schizophrenia Research
29 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.3%
9
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.0%
10
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.9%
11
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 43%
1.7%
12
Neuroscience
88 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
13
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.7%
14
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.6%
15
Behavioral Neuroscience
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
16
Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
17
Psychopharmacology
59 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
18
Neurobiology of Learning and Memory
35 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
19
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 22%
1.2%
20
Brain Sciences
52 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
21
Journal of Neuroscience Research
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
22
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 21%
0.9%
23
Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
24
Neuropsychopharmacology
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
25
Molecular Psychiatry
242 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
26
Neuropharmacology
60 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
27
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
28
Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
29
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
106 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
30
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.7%