Back

Longitudinal Plasma Proteome Changes Before and After Catheter Ablation in Atrial Fibrillation

Reilly, S.; Yiu, C. H. K.; Ma, C. S.; Betts, T. R.; Rajappan, K.; Ginks, M.; Pedersen, M.; Bashir, Y.; Wijesurendra, R.

2026-01-07 molecular biology
10.64898/2026.01.07.698107 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundProteins in human plasma serve as critical markers for predicting disease risk and guiding therapeutic development. Current prediction models for atrial fibrillation (AF) largely rely on electronic health records; however, the plasma proteome of patients with AF reflects key biological processes, including inflammation, that are not captured by clinical variables alone. Circulating inflammatory mediators contribute to electrical and structural remodelling in the atria, thereby sustaining the AF phenotype. Identification of plasma proteins associated with AF may therefore improve understanding of the inflammatory and other biological processes underlying AF pathophysiology. ObjectiveIn this study, we profiled the plasma proteome of patients with paroxysmal AF (pxAF), persistent AF (persAF), and non-AF controls using Olink assay technology. MethodsPlasma samples from 30 individuals were analysed with the Olink Reveal panel. Differential expression analysis of normalised protein expression (NPX) values was performed between groups, with differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) defined by P < 0.05. ResultsWe identified 87 DEPs in pxAF and 107 DEPs in persAF compared with controls. From these, we shortlisted 11 candidate proteins that were upregulated in persAF at baseline and showed reduced expression 12 months after catheter ablation. This subset of proteins is implicated in the regulation of inflammation (CCL23, CXCL10, IL33), metabolism (ALDH3A1, NDUFS6), cell-matrix adhesion (AFAP1L1, LGALS7, SPOCK1), and physiological signalling (NOS1, PROK1, PTH). ConclusionCollectively, these plasma proteins highlight systemic molecular mechanisms contributing to AF pathogenesis and represent potential AF-specific biomarkers warranting further investigation in larger clinical cohorts and mechanistic studies.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.