Back

The modular nature of long-association pathways in the human brain

Maffei, C.; Celestine, M. R.; Gong, T.; Jones, R.; Dann, E.; Lehman, J.; Augustinack, J.; Wang, H.; Haber, S. N.; Yendiki, A.

2026-01-08 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.01.07.698021 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Human brain functions are organized within large-scale networks, yet the long-range structural pathways that support them remain only partly understood. Diffusion MRI tractography has enabled non-invasive mapping of these connections but its low resolution has also contributed to a view of white matter association bundles as monolithic entities linking distant cortical regions. This contrasts with anatomical studies in non-human primates and humans, which show these bundles act as conduits for complex systems of short- and long-range projections. Here we investigate the dorsal branch of the superior longitudinal fasciculus (SLF-I), the proposed structural backbone of the dorsal attention network, whose anatomy in humans is debated. Using anatomic tracing, polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography, and in vivo and ex vivo diffusion MRI, we reconstruct the SLF-I across species, modalities, and scales. High resolution tractography (<750 m), consistent with tracer and PS-OCT data, reveals multiple fiber systems of varying lengths rather than uniform parieto-frontal connections observed at more conventional resolution (1.5 mm). Comparative analyses show a consistent organization: the SLF-I carries short-range cortico-cortical projections rostral to area 6 and longer, layered connections extending to parietal regions, while direct parieto-frontal connectivity is mostly supported by the adjacent cingulum bundle. These findings reconcile our understanding of the SLF-I across the scales of non-invasive neuroimaging and invasive anatomic studies and provide an updated framework for future investigations of large-scale networks in health and disease.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.