Within-host adaptive evolution is limited by genetic drift in experimental human influenza A virus infections
Ferreri, L. M.; Vargas-Maldonado, N.; Le Sage, V.; Leyson, C. M.; Pauly, M. D.; VanInsberghe, D.; Raghunathan, V.; Danzy, S.; Macenczak, H.; Traenkner, J.; Flu CHIM Study Group, ; Catchpole, A.; Mann, A.; Rouphael, N.; Lakdawala, S.; Koelle, K.; Lowen, A. C.
Show abstract
Selection of advantageous mutations drives the emergence of dominant variants during seasonal influenza epidemics. However, within-host detection of such variants remains rare, limiting our understanding of how selection operates at the scale of individual hosts. In this study, we used a controlled human infection model to examine the within-host evolutionary dynamics in thirteen participants intranasally infected with a seasonal H3N2 influenza A virus. Although this clinical trial is ongoing, our work represents a pre-planned, interim, exploratory analysis. Results in this system were contrasted with those observed in a ferret model of infection. The inoculum, used in both humans and ferrets, carried standing diversity that enabled evaluation of variant trajectories during infection. Although the dynamics were variable among participants, in humans, the minor variants in the PA and NP gene segments tended to increase in frequency as infection progressed. Variant dynamics were more consistent among ferrets but showed differences from humans in the fate of the minor NP allele. Based on these observations, we fit a population genetic model to longitudinal measurements of variant frequencies. Estimates of variant selection coefficients and effective viral population sizes indicated that in humans the two minor variants had a selective advantage over the major variants, but genetic drift was strong, limiting the efficiency of selection. In ferrets, the PA minor variant also was estimated to have a selective advantage, while the NP minor variant was estimated to have a selective disadvantage. Moreover, effective viral population sizes were estimated to be considerably higher in ferrets than in humans, indicating that genetic drift was weaker in ferrets. Our analyses reveal differing selective environments acting on influenza viruses in human and ferret hosts and indicate that selection at the within-host level is weakened by genetic drift.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Evolutionary features of a prolific subtype of avian influenza A virus in European waterfowl 97%
- Identification of H3N2 NA and PB1-F2 genetic variants and their association with disease symptoms in the 2014-15 influenza season 95%
- Accumulation of copy-back viral genomes during respiratory syncytial virus infection is preceded by diversification of the copy-back viral genome population followed by selection 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Host obesity impacts genetic variation in influenza A viral populations 97%
- Swine H1N1 influenza virus variants with enhanced polymerase activity and HA stability promote airborne transmission in ferrets 96%
- Influenza Viruses in Mice: Deep Sequencing Analysis of Serial Passage and Effects of Sialic Acid Structural Variation 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Population immunity to clade 2.3.4.4b H5N1 is dominated by anti-neuraminidase antibodies 95%
- Synergy between HA cleavage site sequence and NA-mediated plasminogen recruitment as a virulence mechanism for low pathogenic avian influenza 94%
- Imprinted anti-hemagglutinin and anti-neuraminidase antibody responses after childhood infections of A(H1N1) and A(H1N1)pdm09 influenza viruses 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evidence for adaptive evolution in the receptor-binding domain of seasonal coronaviruses OC43 and 229E 96%
- Mapping person-to-person variation in viral mutations that escape polyclonal serum targeting influenza hemagglutinin 95%
- Increased public health threat of avian-origin H3N2 influenza virus during evolution in dogs 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.