Back

Rapid loss of doxycycline effectiveness against gonorrhea after implementation of post-exposure prophylaxis in southern California: an observational study

Yechezkel, M.; Helekal, D.; Kapadia, B.; Hong, V.; Pomichowski, M. E.; Reyes, I. A. C.; Davis, G. S.; Mueller, N. F.; Grad, Y. H.; Tartof, S. Y.; Lewnard, J. A.

2026-01-08 epidemiology
10.64898/2026.01.07.26343623 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundPost-exposure prophylaxis with doxycycline (doxyPEP) within 72 hours after sex is recommended to prevent chlamydia, gonorrhea, and syphilis among United States men who have sex with men (MSM) and transgender women (TGW). However, concerns surround potential expansion of Neisseria gonorrhoeae lineages harboring antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in settings that implement doxyPEP. MethodsWe assessed the effectiveness of doxyPEP against chlamydia, gonorrhea, and syphilis among individuals receiving care from the Kaiser Permanente Southern California integrated healthcare system between 1 January, 2023 and 30 June, 2025. Primary analyses estimated treatment effectiveness by comparing history of doxyPEP prescription fills [≤]90 days before positive or negative tests for infection with Chlamydia trachomatis, N. gonorrhoeae, and Treponema pallidum. We evaluated changes in treatment effectiveness against gonorrhea over time and in association with the proportion of local N. gonorrhoeae isolates harboring tetM, a plasmid-borne gene conferring high-level tetracycline resistance. ResultsAmong 26,582 individuals meeting eligibility criteria, 2,262 (8{middle dot}5%) received [≥]1 doxyPEP fill during the study period. DoxyPEP fills occurred [≤]90 days before 39 of 4,659 (0{middle dot}8%) positive and 3,288 of 130,138 (2{middle dot}5%) negative C. trachomatis tests; 212 of 6,539 (3{middle dot}2%) positive and 3,112 of 128,238 (2{middle dot}4%) negative N. gonorrhoeae tests; and 11 of 2,169 (0{middle dot}5%) positive and 794 of 26,913 (3{middle dot}0%) negative T. pallidum tests. Throughout the study period, treatment effectiveness of doxyPEP against chlamydia, gonorrhea, and syphilis was 66{middle dot}5% (53{middle dot}6-75{middle dot}9%), -1{middle dot}8% (-18{middle dot}5 to 12{middle dot}5%), and 60{middle dot}7% (28{middle dot}3-78{middle dot}5%), respectively. Treatment effectiveness against gonorrhea declined from 42{middle dot}3% (2{middle dot}7-65{middle dot}8%) before statewide doxyPEP implementation to -15{middle dot}0% (-51{middle dot}1 to 11{middle dot}4%) from January-June, 2025, in association with rapid expansion of tetM prevalence among circulating N. gonorrhoeae lineages. Treatment effectiveness during periods with tetM detected among 20-29{middle dot}9% of N. gonorrhoeae isolates was 47{middle dot}2% (4{middle dot}1-70{middle dot}3%), declining to -8{middle dot}5% (-33{middle dot}2 to 11{middle dot}2%) during periods with tetM detected among [≥]50% of isolates. ConclusionsWe report rapid loss of doxyPEP effectiveness against gonorrhea within the first year after doxyPEP implementation among MSM and TGW in southern California, associated with expansion of high-level tetracycline resistance in N. gonorrhoeae. This outcome, alongside persisting effectiveness against chlamydia and syphilis, may inform risk-benefit considerations for doxyPEP implementation strategies. FundingUS Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.