Managing Cancer and Living Meaningfully Therapy Delivered as a novel remote intervention in individuals diagnosed with a Primary Central Nervous System Tumor
Acquaye-Mallory, A.; Rodin, G.; Managoli, M.; Robins, K. R.; Stockdill, M. L.; Leeper, H. E.; Vera, E.; Mendoza, T.; King, A. L.; Cassidy, M. L.; Gilbert, M. R.; Armstrong, T. S.
Show abstract
BackgroundPrimary central nervous system (CNS) tumors affect patients psychological well-being and quality of life. Individualized approaches, such as Managing Cancer and Living Meaningfully (CALM), have shown potential in advanced cancers for improving these outcomes. AimsThis study assessed the effects and feasibility of CALM delivered remotely to a diverse cohort of patients with a primary CNS tumor. MethodsPatients completed 3-6 remote CALM sessions focusing on 4 interrelated domains. Depression, death anxiety, attachment style, and quality of life were assessed at study enrollment, 3-months, and 6-months into the intervention. ResultsOf the 19 patients enrolled, 15 (79% retention rate) completed the study. Most patients had a high-grade (47%) tumor, mainly diagnosed in the brain (60%). The median age was 44 years (range, 24-70). Feasibility was demonstrated through adherence to completing outcome questionnaires and a high level of patient satisfaction (100% found it worthwhile). Although no statistically significant changes were seen in depression, death anxiety, attachment anxiety, or quality of life (p > 0.05; g = -0.09 to 0.78) at any measured time, a clinically meaningful decrease in depression was observed at the 6-month point (mean difference = -3.36, p = 0.13) among spine tumor patients. ConclusionsThis study demonstrated that delivering CALM via telehealth is feasible, as evidenced by high compliance, low attrition, and acceptability among patients diagnosed with CNS tumors. The findings indicated meaningful reductions in depressive symptoms among patients with spinal cord tumors. These preliminary positive findings justify further evaluation of the feasibility and effectiveness of CALM in a larger sample. Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT04852302
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluating the effectiveness of mindfulness alone compared to exercise and mindfulness on fatigue in women with gynaecology cancer (GEMS): Protocol for a randomised feasibility trial 93%
- Study Protocol: LIAM Mc Trial (Linking In with Advice and supports for Men impacted by Metastatic cancer) 93%
- Do people with disabilities experience disparities in cancer care? A systematic review 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Mobile App for Prolonged Grief among Bereaved Parents: Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial 93%
- Factors associated with self-reported health among New Zealand military Veterans: a cross-sectional study 92%
- The patient experience of COVID-19: A qualitative investigation with symptomatic outpatients 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Assessing awareness of blood cancer symptoms and barriers to symptomatic presentation: Measure development and results from a population survey in the UK 93%
- Risk-Reducing Salpingectomy: Considerations from an OBGYN Perspective 91%
- Study Protocol of A Phase II Study to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of Neo-adjuvant Pembrolizumab and Radiotherapy in Localized Rectal Cancer 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Exploring Patient Centered Perspectives on Suicidal Ideation: A Mixed Methods Investigation in Gastrointestinal Cancer Care 94%
- Immunotherapy and Cannabis: A Harmful Drug Interaction or Reefer Madness? 90%
- Hormone Receptor-status Prediction in Breast Cancer Using Gene Expression Profiles and Their Macroscopic Landscape 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Impact of a natural disaster on access to care and biopsychosocial outcomes among Hispanic/Latino cancer survivors 94%
- A distinct symptom pattern emerges for COVID-19 Long-Haul: A nationwide study 93%
- Disparities in outcomes among patients diagnosed with cancer associated with emergency department visits 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.