Co-Designing Research Priorities in Developmental Neuroscience: A Community-Based Participatory Approach
Hiley, K.; Ryan, D.; Kouara, L.; Mirza, Z.; Shire, K.; Mon-Williams, M.; Mushtaq, F.
Show abstract
Children and adolescents, the primary participants in developmental neuroscience research, are rarely consulted or included in the research design process. By neglecting their perspectives and needs, we risk limiting the relevance and effectiveness of translational research that might emerge from such research. Here, we report on a process of co-development with adolescents in the UK city of Bradford to inform the generation of a new developmental neuroimaging research programme. We employed a two-study community-based participatory approach and used mixed methods to identify the research priorities of this community. In the first study, 79 secondary school students from four schools were introduced to fundamental neuroscience concepts during five one-hour workshops. In groups, they then designed research studies, centred around topics they deemed imported, and were asked to present their ideas on posters, role playing as neuroscientists. Reflexive thematic analysis was conducted on these posters, extracting ten key themes. In the second study, 387 students from four schools ranked the ten extracted themes in order of importance. Mental health and stress consistently emerged as the highest priorities across groups. Exploratory analysis revealed that the priority for themes exploring healthy routines and understanding anti-social behaviours varied across schools and the importance of mental health, and topics related to video gaming varied significantly between genders. This work provides an illustration of how a place-based participatory approach can inform the design of developmental neuroscience programmes, improving both equity and translational relevance.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Factors influencing wellbeing in young people during COVID-19: A survey with 6291 young people in Wales 95%
- How a year of pandemic and related public health measures impacted youth and young adults and the foundations they build upon: Qualitative interviews in Ontario Canada 94%
- Gender and mental health of adolescents: a conceptual framework developed in a Delphi study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Examining the relationship between adolescent health behaviors, brain health, and academic achievement using fNIRS 93%
- Academic Success and Mental Health: The Paradox of Frontoparietal-Default Mode Network Coupling among Children Facing Poverty 92%
- Special Issue: Demographic and Mental Health Assessments in the Adolescent Brain and Cognitive Development Study: Updates and Longitudinal Trajectories 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Priorities for Future Research about Screen Use and Adolescent Mental Health: A Participatory Prioritization Study 95%
- Co-development of a best practice checklist for mental health data science: A Delphi study 91%
- Mental and social health of children and adolescents with pre-existing mental or somatic problems during the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- ‘Kindness By Post’: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation of A Participatory Public Mental Health Project 94%
- How did people cope during the COVID-19 pandemic? A Structural Topic Modelling Analysis of Free-Text Data from 11,000 UK Adults 92%
- The measurement properties and acceptability of a new parent-infant bonding tool (‘Me and My Baby’) designed for use in a universal healthcare setting in the UK 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effects of wearing FFP2 masks on SARS-CoV-2 infection rates in classrooms 91%
- Relationship between early childhood non-parental childcare and diet, physical activity, sedentary behaviour, and sleep: A systematic review of longitudinal studies 90%
- Neuroscientific Insights into the Built Environment: A Systematic Review of Empirical Research on Indoor Environmental Quality, Physiological Dynamics, and Psychological Well-Being in Real-Life Contexts 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.