Tracing the Neanderthal-Modern Human hybrid zone using paleogenomic data
Di Santo, L. N.; Quilodran, C. S.; Cerrito, P.; Currat, M.
Show abstract
Interbreeding between closely related lineages is a pervasive evolutionary feature across taxa1, including modern humans, who admixed with Neanderthals and other archaic hominins2,3. Identifying where gene flow between these lineages happened can shed light on ecological and adaptive contexts in which introgressed genes were acquired. However, mapping ancient hybrid zones is challenging because post-admixture population dynamics obscure their genetic signatures. Here, we determine the conditions under which spatial patterns of introgressed DNA in ancient genomes allow the inference of the geographic location of past hybridization events during population expansions. Using computational simulations, we identify the conditions under which introgression-based statistics provide informative signals about past hybridization events. We show that the mean genomic proportion of introgressed DNA, which can be readily calculated from low-coverage ancient genomes, reveals a cline that increases with distance from the population expansion source until reaching the hybrid zone boundary and persists over time. Comparison with empirical Neanderthal introgression distribution from an extended Eurasian paleogenomic dataset supports a prolonged admixture pulse extending far beyond the Levant in western Eurasia. Our findings highlight the power of paleogenomics to reconstruct the spatiotemporal dynamics of species interactions.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- MaLAdapt reveals novel targets of adaptive introgression from Neanderthals and Denisovans in worldwide human populations 97%
- Temporal variation in introgressed segments' length statistics sheds light on past admixture pulses 97%
- Genomic analyses capture the human-induced demographic collapse and recovery in a wide-ranging cervid 96%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.