Back

Discovery of potent oligopeptides for various metabolic diseases using deep learning

Xiao, B.; Zhu, H.; Ma, C.; Wang, X.; Feng, Z.; Lang, R.; Shan, H.; He, R.; Meng, Z.; Zhou, Y.; Huang, J.; Wei, S.; Liu, D.; Liu, J.; Shi, Z.; Tang, X.; Wang, J.; Liu, C.; Wang, L.; Li, Z.; Zhang, Y.-B.

2026-01-07 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.01.06.697667 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI)-based methods are increasingly critical in peptide drug discovery, but their applications are limited in a narrow scope such as antimicrobial peptides. For indications where peptide therapy inherently excels, such as metabolism, endocrinology, and tissue regeneration, AI-based pipeline for therapeutic peptide discovery is long awaited but still unmet. Here, we propose a deep learning-based pipeline, Deepeptide, capable of identifying therapeutic oligopeptides for various metabolism-related indications. Leveraging the intrinsical relationship of disease indication -- biological processes -- molecular functions, Deepeptide discovers oligopeptides with indication-ameliorating-related molecular functions as lead candidates for indication of interest. Deepeptide was applied in five representative indications of metabolism, endocrinology, and tissue regeneration: angiogenesis, lipid metabolism, osteogenesis, glucose metabolism, and anti-angiogenesis. Overall, 62% of the identified oligopeptide candidates demonstrated significant bioactivity in vitro, with most of them showing comparable potency to the first-line drugs. Notably, the heptapeptide AP7 exhibited angiogenic potency comparable to VEGF in excisional wound splinting mouse model by promoting cell migration rather than proliferation, and hexapeptide TP6 showed significant dual-efficacy against hyperlipidemia and obesity in high-fat diet mice by inhibiting lipid synthesis and regulating gut microbiota. These findings highlight the potential and generalizability of Deepeptide in therapeutic oligopeptide discovery for metabolic diseases.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.