Near perfect identification of half sibling versus niece/nephew avuncular pairs without pedigree information or genotyped relatives
Sapin, E.; Keller, M. C.; Kelly, K.
Show abstract
MotivationLarge-scale genomic biobanks contain thousands of second-degree relatives with missing pedigree metadata. Accurately distinguishing half-sibling (H-S) from niece/nephew-avuncular (N/N-A) pairs--both sharing approximately 25% of the genome--remains a significant challenge. Current SNP-based methods rely on aggregate Identical-By-Descent (IBD) segment counts and age differences, but substantial distributional overlap leads to high misclassification rates. There is a critical need for a scalable, genotype-only method that can resolve these "half-degree" ambiguities without requiring observed pedigrees or extensive relative information. ResultsWe present a novel computational framework that achieves near-complete separation of H-S and N/N-A pairs using haplotype-level sharing features derived from across-chromosome phasing. By modeling these features with a multivariate Gaussian mixture model (GMM), we demonstrate exceptional classification performance in biobank-scale data. Ground-truth validation labels were established through a multi-step inference process within a family graph constructed from high-confidence first-degree relationships. To overcome the scarcity of genotyped half-sibling parents, we structurally validated H-S pairs by identifying specific pedigree configurations involving first cousins that are logically incompatible with an avuncular relationship. Our method achieves a sensitivity of 96.9% and a specificity of 99.7% on these structurally-validated pairs. Furthermore, we show that these identified relationships serve as superior phase anchors, that measurably improve the accuracy of across-chromosome homologue assignment. This method provides a robust, scalable solution for pedigree reconstruction and the control of cryptic relatedness in large-scale genomic studies. Contactemmanuel.sapin@colorado.edu, kristen.kelly@colorado.edu, and matthew.c.keller@colorado.edu
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A novel framework for analysis of the shared genetic background of correlated traits 90%
- The FORCE panel: An all-in-one SNP marker set for confirming investigative genetic genealogy leads and for general forensic applications 90%
- Coyotes in New York city carry variable dog genomic ancestry and influence their interactions with humans 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Using the UK Biobank as a global reference of worldwide populations: application to measuring ancestry diversity from GWAS summary statistics 94%
- RapidoPGS: A rapid polygenic score calculator for summary GWAS data without a test dataset 93%
- A Novel Method for Across-Chromosome Phasing without Relative Data 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Probabilistic estimation of identity by descent segment endpoints and detection of recent selection 93%
- Multiple-testing corrections in selection scans using identity-by-descent segments 93%
- Fast and accurate shared segment detection and relatedness estimation in un-phased genetic data using TRUFFLE 93%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.