Back

Inferring Clinically Relevant Molecular Subtypes of Pancreatic Cancer from Routine Histopathology Using Deep Learning

Akbar, A. R.; Levya, A.; Esnakula, A.; Hassanov, E.; Noonan, A.; Manne, U.; Sahai, V.; Meng, L.; Tsai, S.; Parwani, A.; Chen, W.; Manne, A.; Niazi, M. K. K.

2026-01-08 gastroenterology
10.64898/2026.01.06.26343539
Show abstract

Background and aimsMolecular subtyping of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) into basal-like and classical has established prognostic and predictive value. However, its use in clinical practice is limited by cost, turnaround time, and tissue requirements, thereby restricting its application in the management of PDAC. We introduce PanSubNet (PANcreatic SUBtyping NETwork), an interpretable deep learning framework that predicts therapy-relevant molecular subtypes directly from standard hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained whole-slide images. MethodsPanSubNet was developed using data from 1,055 patients across two multi-institutional cohorts (PANCAN, n=846; TCGA, n=209) with paired histology and RNA sequencing data. Ground-truth labels were derived using the validated Moffitt 50-gene signature refined by GATA6 expression. The model employs dual-scale architecture that fuses cellular-level morphology with tissue-level architecture, leveraging attention mechanisms for multi-scale representation learning and transparent feature attribution. ResultsOn internal validation within PANCAN using five-fold cross-validation, PanSubNet achieved mean area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 88.5% in high-confidence cases, with balanced sensitivity and specificity. External validation on the independent TCGA cohort without fine-tuning demonstrated robust generalizability (AUC 84.0%). PanSubNet preserved and, in metastatic disease, strengthened prognostic stratification compared to RNA-seq-based labels. Prediction uncertainty linked to intermediate transcriptional states, not classification noise. Model predictions are aligned with established transcriptomic programs, differentiation markers, and DNA damage repair signatures. ConclusionsBy enabling rapid, cost-effective molecular stratification from routine H&E-stained slides, PanSubNet offers a clinically deployable and interpretable tool for genetic subtyping. We are gathering data from two institutions to validate and assess real-world performance, supporting integration into digital pathology workflows and advancing precision oncology for PDAC.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
based on 483 papers
Top 7%
11.0%
2
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 13%
11.0%
3
Gastroenterology
based on 11 papers
Top 0.3%
8.2%
4
Nature Genetics
based on 72 papers
Top 2%
7.5%
5
Gut
based on 17 papers
Top 0.6%
5.3%
6
Cancers
based on 57 papers
Top 3%
4.7%
7
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 71%
4.7%
50% of probability mass above
8
Nature Medicine
based on 88 papers
Top 2%
4.5%
9
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
based on 13 papers
Top 0.4%
2.8%
10
Clinical Cancer Research
based on 22 papers
Top 2%
2.8%
11
BMC Cancer
based on 21 papers
Top 2%
2.4%
12
Cell Reports Medicine
based on 49 papers
Top 2%
2.4%
13
eLife
based on 262 papers
Top 13%
2.3%
14
iScience
based on 74 papers
Top 4%
1.6%
15
International Journal of Cancer
based on 18 papers
Top 1%
1.3%
16
npj Genomic Medicine
based on 18 papers
Top 2%
1.2%
17
American Journal of Gastroenterology
based on 15 papers
Top 1%
1.2%
18
The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
based on 24 papers
Top 2%
1.2%
19
eBioMedicine
based on 82 papers
Top 5%
1.2%
20
British Journal of Cancer
based on 22 papers
Top 4%
0.8%
21
npj Precision Oncology
based on 14 papers
Top 4%
0.8%
22
Biomedicines
based on 21 papers
Top 3%
0.8%
23
Genome Medicine
based on 56 papers
Top 8%
0.7%
24
Gut Microbes
based on 15 papers
Top 2%
0.7%
25
npj Digital Medicine
based on 85 papers
Top 15%
0.7%
26
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
based on 14 papers
Top 5%
0.7%
27
Journal of Cystic Fibrosis
based on 10 papers
Top 1%
0.7%
28
Scientific Data
based on 30 papers
Top 4%
0.7%