The acceptability, adaptations, reach, barriers and enablers to the roles of endometriosis nurses and pelvic health & wellbeing coordinators in the Welsh Health Boards: a service evaluation by qualitative methods
Clarke, E.; Rees, N.; Williams, D.; Cooper, A.; Humphris, L.; Edwards, A.; Joseph-Williams, N.
Show abstract
Endometriosis Nurse and Pelvic Health and Wellbeing Co-ordinator (PHWC) roles were introduced in each health board across Wales in early 2020. They were established to improve endometriosis and pelvic health care, as women can face severe problems and with major impacts across their quality of life, requiring expert care. How these staff roles have been incorporated into each health board has differed according to local need and as such, is not fully understood, nor are the benefits of the role as perceived by staff. The aim of this service evaluation is to explore the views and experiences of endometriosis nurses and PHWCs on those roles and services. Mixed qualitative methods were applied (interviews and workshop) between January 2025 and June 2025 to explore the study objectives. Interview data were thematically analysed to identify key themes. Workshop data were reported. The Cardiff University School of Medicine Research Ethics Committee waived the requirement for ethical approval as the project was found to be a service evaluation. The roles are important to health boards and post-holders with discussion of positive impact on patients across the health boards. Key factors in the success or limitation of these roles include: At the macro-levelAvailability of resources for staffing, training, administration, clinics and theatre time. Service fragility: The services, particularly endometriosis, rely on usually one person per health board and so cease during leave or recruitment, with no succession planning. At the meso-levelColleague, peer and other healthcare professional support. At the micro-levelClarity of role description and establishing boundaries of the service. Support and guidance for new endometriosis nurses. Funding StatementThe Health and Care Research Wales Evidence Centre is funded by Health and Care Research Wales on behalf of Welsh Government. Executive SummaryO_ST_ABSBackgroundC_ST_ABSEndometriosis Nurse and Pelvic Health and Wellbeing Co-ordinator (PHWC) roles were introduced in each health board across Wales in early 2020. They were established to improve endometriosis and pelvic health care, as women can face severe problems and with major impacts across their quality of life, requiring expert care. How these staff roles have been incorporated into each health board has differed according to local need and as such, is not fully understood, nor are the benefits of the role as perceived by staff. The aim of this service evaluation is to explore the views and experiences of endometriosis nurses and PHWCs on those roles and services. MethodsMixed qualitative methods were applied (interviews and workshop) between January 2025 and June 2025 to explore the study objectives. Interview data were thematically analysed to identify key themes. Workshop data were reported. Key FindingsThe roles are important to health boards and post-holders with discussion of positive impact on patients across the health boards. Key factors in the success or limitation of these roles include: O_LIAt the macro-level: O_LIAvailability of resources for staffing, training, administration, clinics and theatre time C_LIO_LIService fragility: The services, particularly endometriosis, rely on usually one person per health board and so cease during leave or recruitment, with no succession planning C_LI C_LIO_LIAt the meso-level: Colleague, peer and other healthcare professional support C_LIO_LIAt the micro-level: O_LIClarity of role description and establishing boundaries of the service C_LIO_LISupport and guidance for new endometriosis nurses C_LI C_LI Key PrioritiesKey priorities that could support the endometriosis nurse and pelvic health wellbeing coordinator roles are summarised in figure one below. These are summarised from table seven (section five). O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=128 SRC="FIGDIR/small/25341955v1_fig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (32K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@13500b1org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@c09652org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1cd1217org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@5ebf99_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG O_FLOATNOFigure one:C_FLOATNO Summary of what could be done to support the endometriosis nurse and / or pelvic health wellbeing coordinator roles C_FIG O_TBL View this table: org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@74eb8aorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@13cae7org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@16e1111org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@12277edorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1ef757f_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_TBL O_FLOATNOTable 7:C_FLOATNO O_TABLECAPTIONSuggested potential improvements to the PHWC and endometriosis nurse roles C_TABLECAPTION C_TBL
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Factors influencing referral to maternity models of care in Australian general practice 96%
- Process of Use of Evidence Products by Frontline Maternal, Newborn and Child Health Staff at the Facility Level in Ghana. 95%
- Exploring midwives understanding of respectful and non-abusive maternal care in Kumasi, Ghana: Qualitative Inquiry 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Experience of induction of labour: a cross-sectional postnatal survey of women at UK maternity units 96%
- Challenges and facilitators in pathways to cancer diagnosis in Southern Africa: A qualitative study 95%
- Companionship for women using English maternity services during COVID-19: National and organisational perspectives 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- A mixed methods study of attitudes on location of gynaecological oncology outpatient care: a patient and healthcare professional questionnaire 96%
- “We tend to get pad happy” : a qualitative study of health practitioners’ perspectives on continence care for older people in hospital 94%
- National statutory reporting: not even ticking the boxes? The quality of ‘Learning from Deaths’ reporting in Quality Accounts within the NHS in England 2017-2020 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Impact of the Federated Data Platform's digital surgery scheduling system on elective theatre utilisation at an NHS Trust: an interrupted time series analysis 92%
- Measures of socioeconomic advantage are not independent predictors of support for healthcare AI: subgroup analysis of a national Australian survey 91%
- The performance of national COVID-19 ‘Symptom Checkers’: A comparative case simulation study 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.