Back

The Influence of Ligands on AlphaFold3 Prediction of Cryptic Pockets

Lazou, M.; Tuchscherer, F.; Vajda, S.; Joseph-McCarthy, D.

2026-01-04 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.01.04.697564 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Cryptic pockets are binding sites that are formed or exposed upon a conformational change. They represent an important class of potentially druggable binding sites. Reliably predicting cryptic pockets capable of binding ligands, however, remains a challenge. Herein we examine the use of AlphaFold 3 (AF3) for generating realistic conformational ensembles that include known cryptic pockets. We find that AF3 is generally able to reproduce the scale of conformational change required for cryptic site formation. When given a cryptic-site ligand for the protein, AF3 predominantly predicts conformations competent to bind the ligand in the cryptic site; without the ligand, conformations lacking the cryptic pocket generally dominate. While the results may reflect a bias toward memorized structural priors, the level of detrimental memorization appears to be limited. We also show that the choice of the ligand can significantly impact the predictions, and that AF3 is able to produce models with the ligand correctly positioned. Variability in ligand position, however, suggests that generating ensembles of co-folded predictions is critical to enhancing the likelihood of obtaining a correct binding mode. Overall, AF3-generated protein-ligand structural ensembles have potential utility in cryptic-site drug discovery, and they can reveal ligands likely to bind to those sites.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics
88 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
30.5%
2
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
238 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
9.6%
3
Protein Science
246 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
7.7%
4
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 17%
5.4%
50% of probability mass above
5
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
242 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.0%
6
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
167 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.2%
7
ACS Omega
105 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.2%
8
Structure
193 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.2%
9
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.6%
10
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 11%
2.6%
11
Journal of Molecular Biology
232 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
12
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.1%
13
Journal of Cheminformatics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
14
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.7%
15
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
102 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.4%
16
Journal of Molecular Graphics and Modelling
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
17
Biomolecules
100 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
18
Briefings in Bioinformatics
354 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.0%
19
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.0%
20
Frontiers in Bioinformatics
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
21
Bioinformatics Advances
203 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
22
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 32%
0.8%
23
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 66%
0.8%
24
Journal of Structural Biology
64 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%
25
Molecules
39 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
26
Journal of Computational Chemistry
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%