Back

A cell-type-resolved human brain atlas of microRNAs and tRNA fragments

Dubnov, S.; Laski, L.; Zchut, I.; Avidan, O.; Bennett, E. R.; Greenberg, D. S.; Tujerman, A.; Nitzan, M.; Paldor, I.; Soreq, H.

2026-01-04 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.01.04.697535 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundMicroRNAs (miRs) and transfer RNA fragments (tRFs) regulate diverse brain processes, from neurogenesis to neurological disease. While both these small RNA classes have been implicated in cell-type-specific regulation, most studies leaned on bulk measurements, due to technical limitations in detecting small RNAs using single-cell RNA sequencing. Consequently, the cell-type specificity of brain miRs and tRFs remains poorly characterized, limiting functional interpretation. ResultsTo generate a comprehensive, cell-type-resolved atlas of miRs and tRFs from live human brain tissues, we isolated neurons, astrocytes, microglia, and oligodendrocytes from neurosurgery-derived fresh human brain samples and profiled their small RNAs by RNA-sequencing. This revealed pronounced cell-type-specific differences in miR and tRF levels, identified novel small RNA cell-type markers, and provided insight into the genetic regulation of miR cell-type specificity. Notably, neurons exhibited elevated levels of 5' tRNA halves compared to glial cells, including enriched fragments derived from glycine, leucine and lysine tRNAs. Finally, our resource enabled assignment of cell-type origins to miRs associated with healthy brain aging and tRFs linked to Alzheimers disease. ConclusionsHighlighting the importance of cellular context for data interpretation, both human brain miRs and tRFs exhibit pronounced cell-type-specific differences associated with brain aging and neurodegenerative diseases. Combined with an accompanying statistical tool for miR cell-type enrichment analysis, this work provides a publicly available resource for resolving the cell-type origins of small RNAs in the human brain.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.