Back

Impact of competition between precursor and mature microRNAs on stochastic gene expression

Adhikary, R.; Das, D.

2026-01-03 biophysics
10.64898/2026.01.03.697472 bioRxiv
Show abstract

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are key post-transcriptional regulators, processed from precursor miRNAs (pre-miRNAs) into mature miRNAs through nuclear and cytoplasmic proteins. Recent evidence shows that pre-miRNAs and mature miRNAs can compete for the same target mRNAs, yet the impact of this miRNA maturation-driven competition on gene expression noise remains unknown. We address this in widespread feedback motifs where both pre- and mature miRNAs degrade a proteins transcripts, and the protein itself either activates or represses miRNA transcription. Using a mathematical model, we show that miRNA maturation tunes the behavior of positive or negative feedback loops, which function as bistable switches or oscillators at the mean-field level, respectively. The relative degradation of mature versus pre-miRNAs and the mRNA-miRNA co-degradation rates can jointly modulate the parameter regions of bistability or oscillations. Moreover, for positive feedback, stochastic simulations reveal that bimodal mRNA distributions emerge near the saddle-node bifurcation boundaries, but not always within the bistable regions. Bimodal mRNA distributions also appear for negative feedback, but outside the region of limit cycles. Importantly, in both feedback types, such noise-induced bimodality emerges in regions where mean-field analysis predicts no bistability or limit cycles. These results demonstrate that noise-induced phenotypic variability cannot necessarily be linked to underlying deterministic bifurcations and elucidate how miRNA maturation shapes stochastic gene expression in regulatory motifs relevant to development and disease.

Published in Biophysical Journal (predicted rank #4) · training set

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.