Back

Auditory brainstem-cortical anatomy constrains the magnitude of frequency-following responses (FFRs) and event-related potentials (ERPs) coding speech-in-noise

Bidelman, G.; Stirn, J. R.; Rizzi, R.; MacLean, J.; Cheng, H.

2026-01-03 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.01.03.697410 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Speech-evoked brain potentials provide a window into the neural encoding of speech, experience-dependent plasticity, and deficits in central auditory processing from communication disorders. Stronger and faster frequency-following responses (FFRs) and cortical event-related potentials (ERPs) have been interpreted as reflecting more robust and efficient auditory-sensory processing across brainstem and cortical levels. Importantly, these neural signatures relate to real-world listening skills like speech-in-noise (SIN) perception. Yet, how these speech-evoked FFRs/ERPs relate to underlying auditory anatomical structures is unknown. Using a multimodal imaging approach, we recorded FFRs and ERPs to clean and noise-degraded speech sounds to assess the strength of listeners neural encoding of speech at brainstem (FFR) and cortical (ERP) levels. MRI volumetrics of midbrain and transverse temporal gyrus (Heschls gyrus) quantified morphological variation in subcortical and cortical anatomy that underly these EEG potentials. The QuickSIN assessed behavioral SIN abilities. Results showed that larger and thicker right (but not left) Heschls gyrus was related to listeners SIN abilities as well as the size of their cortical ERPs. Structural and functional measures interacted at a subcortical level. For listeners with smaller midbrain volumes, larger speech FFRs were associated with better QuickSIN scores; whereas in individuals with larger midbrain volumes, larger FFRs were related to poorer QuickSIN. Our findings reveal common functional signatures of speech processing (FFRs, ERPs) are constrained by the anatomy of their underlying generators and suggest a complex interplay between auditory brain structure and function in accounting for perceptual SIN capacity.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
NeuroImage
903 papers in training set
Top 1%
12.6%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 19%
9.7%
3
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 11%
6.7%
4
The Journal of Neuroscience
1025 papers in training set
Top 3%
6.7%
5
PLOS Biology
486 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
5.4%
6
Cerebral Cortex
396 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
5.4%
7
Neuroscience Letters
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.4%
50% of probability mass above
8
Molecular Autism
33 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.0%
9
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 32%
3.4%
10
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 12%
2.4%
11
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 22%
2.4%
12
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 9%
2.4%
13
Frontiers in Neuroscience
256 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
14
Current Biology
665 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.5%
15
eneuro
439 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.5%
16
Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
96 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.1%
17
Behavioural Brain Research
77 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
18
Human Brain Mapping
329 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
19
Journal of Neurophysiology
302 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
20
Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
71 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
21
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.0%
22
Imaging Neuroscience
282 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
23
Brain Structure and Function
93 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
24
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 35%
0.8%
25
Translational Psychiatry
260 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
26
NeuroImage: Clinical
144 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
27
Brain Communications
166 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
28
Neuropsychologia
85 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
29
Neuropsychopharmacology
153 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
30
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%