Representing Injuries in Trauma Patients: Development and Evaluation of Embeddings for Injuries
Szolnoky, K.; Attergrim, J.; Ashfaq, A.; Linusson, H.; Gerdin Wärnberg, M.; Berg, J.
Show abstract
AO_SCPLOWBSTRACTC_SCPLOWO_ST_ABSBackgroundC_ST_ABSTrauma patients present with heterogeneous injury patterns that are challenging to represent in statistical models. Traditional approaches either use high-dimensional one-hot encoding, resulting in sparse features, or aggregate injuries into summary scores that lose patient-specific detail. This study developed data-driven ICD-10 embeddings for trauma injuries and evaluated their ability to preserve injury information. MethodsUsing the National Trauma Data Bank, we trained autoencoder models on all trauma patients from 2018 to generate dense vector representations of ICD-10 injury codes. We evaluated embeddings of dimensions 2, 4, 8, 16, and 32 against one-hot encoding using three prediction tasks: in-hospital mortality, emergency department disposition, and blood transfusion within 24 hours. For each hospital included, we trained separate logistic regression and LightGBM models using 2018 data from that hospital, then evaluated performance on 2019 data from the same hospital. Performance was measured using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and stratified by hospital size. ResultsIn LightGBM models, 8-dimensional embeddings improved AUC compared to one-hot encoding of 0.08 (95% CI: 0.06, 0.10) in small hospitals, 0.03 (0.02, 0.04) in medium hospitals, and 0.02 (0.01, 0.02) in large hospitals, with comparable performance in major hospitals (0.00 [-0.01, 0.01]). In logistic regression, 32-dimensional embeddings showed AUC improvements of 0.03 (0.01, 0.05), 0.02 (0.01, 0.03), and 0.02 (0.02, 0.03) for small, medium, and large hospitals respectively, with similar performance in major hospitals (0.01 [0.00, 0.01]). ConclusionICD-10 code injury embeddings with [≥]8 dimensions preserve clinically relevant information and can outperform one-hot encoding while reducing dimensionality. The embeddings and software are openly available to support further trauma research and applications.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Using explainable machine learning to identify patients at risk of reattendance at discharge from emergency departments 95%
- Evaluation of Domain Generalization and Adaptation on Improving Model Robustness to Temporal Dataset Shift in Clinical Medicine 94%
- EHR Foundation Models Improve Robustness in the Presence of Temporal Distribution Shift 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Image and structured data analysis for prognostication of health outcomes in patients presenting to the Emergency Department during the COVID-19 pandemic 93%
- Assessing the effects of data drift on the performance of machine learning models used in clinical sepsis prediction 93%
- A Deep Learning Method to Detect Opioid Prescription and Opioid Use Disorder from Electronic Health Records 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparing neural language models for medical concept representation and patient trajectory prediction 95%
- Building Large-Scale Registries from Unstructured Clinical Notes using a Low-Resource Natural Language Processing Pipeline 93%
- Enriching Representation Learning Using 53 Million Patient Notes through Human Phenotype Ontology Embedding 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Predictability and Stability Testing to Assess Clinical Decision Instrument Performance for Children After Blunt Torso Trauma 93%
- Generalizability Challenges of Mortality Risk Prediction Models: A Retrospective Analysis on a Multi-center Database 93%
- Modular Clinical Decision Support Networks (MoDN)—Updatable, Interpretable, and Portable Predictions for Evolving Clinical Environments 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.