A Unified Rubric and Similarity Metric for Biomedical Publication Types and Study Designs
Smalheiser, N. R.; Menke, J. D.; Holt, A. W.
Show abstract
ObjectiveOur goal is to unify the 72 biomedical publication types and study designs (collectively, PTs) into a single rubric and hierarchy. Materials and MethodsThis is carried out in a data-driven manner by computing pairwise similarities of each PT against all others to form a similarity matrix. By performing hierarchical clustering we place each PT in a specific category and collect these into broader categories. ResultsSpearman correlations among PT pairs ranged from strongly negative to strongly positive (-0.732 to +0.997), with a mean of 0.176. Overall, we obtained 13 clusters of PTs and 5 more general categories: Observational Clinical Research, Qualitative and Genetic Methods, Clinical Evaluation and Validation, Interventional Trial Research, and Scholarly Synthesis and Discourse. These were then utilized to construct a unified hierarchy of PT terms. DiscussionThe rubric provides a flexible classification scheme for publication types and study designs that can accommodate new PTs as they are added over time. ConclusionThe similarity metric has the potential to improve the modeling, implementation and evaluation of automated indexing systems. The PT rubric provides an overview that complements the existing NIH MeSH Hierarchy trees, and the unified hierarchy permits proper automated expansion for PT indexing and PubMed user queries involving PT terms.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- COVID-19-related research data availability and quality according to the FAIR principles: A meta-research study 97%
- Introducing the EMPIRE Index: A novel, value-based metric framework to measure the impact of medical publications 95%
- The Rise of Open Data Practices Among Bioscientists at the University of Edinburgh 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Creating an Indexing Scheme for Case Series Articles 95%
- Evaluation of SURUS: a Named Entity Recognition System to Extract Knowledge from Interventional Study Records 93%
- Investigator-initiated versus industry-sponsored trials – Visibility and relevance of randomized controlled trials in clinical practice guidelines (IMPACT) 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- The use of the Registered Reports format for publication of randomized clinical trials: a cross-sectional study 93%
- The impact of retracted randomised controlled trials on systematic reviews and clinical practice guidelines: a meta-epidemiological study 92%
- Results reporting for clinical trials led by medical universities and university hospitals in the Nordic countries was often missing or delayed 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.