Back

Eating Disorders and Parkinson's Disease - 1: Comorbidities, Neurobiology and Family History

Krueger, A. H.; Bergen, A. W.; Litvan, I.; Fileteo, V.; Makowski, C.; Murray, S.; McGlone, K.; Garvin, M.; Drouin, A.; Kauffman, A.; Steele, C.; Kaye, W. H.

2026-01-05 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.64898/2026.01.03.25342594 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveIn response to a clinical observation of an Anorexia Nervosa (AN) patient with family history of Parkinsons Disease (FHoPD), and evidence of similarities in dopamine function, personality, anxiety and weight loss symptoms between AN and PD, we completed a pilot study to estimate FHoPD in families of those with eating disorders (EDs). MethodWe ascertained FHoPD among ED patients and community participants, and estimated relative risks (RRs) for AN, Bulimia Nervosa (BN) and Binge Eating Disorder (BED). ResultsWe observed increased FHoPD among patients and community participants (N=482) meeting criteria for ED diagnoses compared to community participants (N=394) without an ED diagnosis. For AN, FHoPD prevalence was 6.6% vs 3.4%, {chi}2=4.638, p=.031, RR=1.935, 95%CI=1.012-3.768. For BN, FHoPD prevalence was 7.4% vs 3.4%, {chi}2=4.941, p=.026, RR=2.169, 95%CI=1.023-4.620. For BED, FHoPD prevalence was 13.3% vs 3.4%, {chi}2=6.953, p=.008, RR=3.886, 95%CI=1.108-11.524. ConclusionsEDs are associated with an elevated FHoPD. Translational analyses leveraging disorder-specific research resources may benefit our understanding of the genetics and neuroscience of both disorders. HighlightsO_LIAN and PD share premorbid anxiety, harm avoidance and dopaminergic dysfunction. C_LIO_LIFHoPD RRs are two-fold for AN and Bulimia Nervosa (BN) and four-fold for Binge Eating Disorder (BED) in a sample of treatment seeking and community participants. C_LIO_LIED and PD familiality, and advances in PD and ED genetics and neuroscience research provide opportunities for cross-disorder research. C_LI

Published in European Eating Disorders Review · not in our set (fewer than 10 published preprints to learn from) · training set

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.