Back

Computational design of orthogonal TCR α/β interfaces for dual-TCR therapeutics

Kinjo, T.; Yu, S.; Nicely, N. I.; Leaver-Fay, A.; Kim, W.; Kuhlman, B.

2026-01-02 bioengineering
10.64898/2026.01.02.697397 bioRxiv
Show abstract

T-cell receptors (TCRs) recognize peptides presented by MHC, enabling access to intracellular targets that are largely inaccessible to antibodies and difficult to target with small molecules. Despite this potential, their inherent cross-reactivity limits tumor specificity, while single-antigen targeting provides limited coverage of intratumoral heterogeneity. Dual-TCR therapeutics comprising two distinct TCRs could enhance tumor specificity via combinatorial recognition while broadening coverage across heterogeneous antigens. However, practical development of dual-TCR therapeutics has been limited by /{beta} subunit mispairing that prevents efficient production and creates undesired binding properties. Here, we develop orthogonal TCR /{beta} interfaces that prevent subunit mispairing. Using computational multistate design and second-site suppressor strategies implemented in Rosetta, we identified over 250 TCR variants for experimental screening to assess protein stability and pairing fidelity. The top-performing designs achieved approximately 95% correct pairing, as validated by mass spectrometry and X-ray crystallography. Focusing mutations on constant domains and conserved framework regions of variable domains enabled broad applicability across diverse TCRs while preserving antigen recognition. Using these orthogonal interfaces, we developed trispecific T-cell engagers (TriTEs) that target two cancer-testis antigens and CD3 on T cells, demonstrating enhanced potency under dual-antigen engagement (EC50 of 380 fM) while maintaining high activity when targeting cells displaying a single antigen (EC50s of 48 pM and 20 pM). This orthogonal TCR interface technology establishes a generalizable platform for engineering multi-specific immune therapeutics targeting diverse cancer antigens.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.