Cross-View Latent Integration via Nonparametric Gamma Shrinkage Factor Analysis
Akell, H.; Lazecka, M.; Adhithya Haridoss, D.; Urban, M.; Staub, E.; Szczurek, E.
Show abstract
Factor analysis is a dominant paradigm for multi-omic heterogeneous data, but is challenged by partially redundant signals and noise across views and by an unknown true number of factors. We present CLING, an unsupervised multi-view factor model with hierarchical Bayesian sparsity priors: a product-of-Gammas prior inducing cumulative column-wise shrinkage (increasing with factor index) coupled with a Gamma-Gamma local-precision hierarchy on loadings yielding heavy-tailed marginals. This pairing enables automatic factor selection by adaptively deactivating unsupported factors while retaining active ones during inference, and induces selective sparsity that allows salient loadings to escape shrinkage while collapsing negligible ones. As a fully conjugate hierarchical model, CLING admits a scalable variational inference algorithm for multi-view data. Across synthetic benchmarks and multiomics datasets, CLING recovers more accurate factors and more informative loadings while explaining at least as much variance as competitive multi-view baselines; on glioblastoma gene expression and DNA methylation data, CLING identifies pathways linked to tumor subtype and patient age. Source code: https://github.com/szczurek-lab/CLING.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- A Bayesian Approach to Restricted Latent Class Models for Scientifically-Structured Clustering of Multivariate Binary Outcomes 95%
- Bayesian inference for copy number intra-tumoral heterogeneity from single-cell RNA-sequencing data 95%
- An Interpretable Bayesian Clustering Approach with Feature Selection for Analyzing Spatially Resolved Transcriptomics Data 94%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.