An external, contemporary evaluation of the Epic End of Life Care Index among hospitalized patients across two large health systems: A retrospective cohort study
Kohn, R.; Courtright, K. R.; Grau-Sepulveda, M.; Olsen, M. K.; Madden, V. L.; Sewell, B.; Sheu, D.; Ahmad, Y. S.; Auriemma, C. L.; Nimetz, A.; Dennos, A.; Hart, K. W.; Lee, J.; Creekmur, B.; Nau, C. L.; Nguyen, H. Q.; Wang, S.; Boyer, G.; Lundstrom, T.; Postema, L.; Roth, D. J.; Vandewarker, J.; Halpern, S. D.; Lokhnygina, Y.
Show abstract
BackgroundThe Epic End of Life Care Index (EOLCI) predicts one-year mortality and was developed to improve serious illness care. However, prior external EOLCI evaluations had limited sample sizes, populations, and equity evaluations. In preparation for a multi-system pragmatic clinical trial, we sought to evaluate the EOLCI performance and equity in the trials two participating health systems. ObjectiveEvaluate EOLCI model performance overall and across key subgroups. Design/Setting/PatientsRetrospective cohort study of patients hospitalized for [≥]36 hours in 2022 to 39 hospitals in the Trinity Health and Kaiser Permanente Southern California (KPSC) health systems. MeasurementsWe predicted one-year mortality risk stratified by health system using the EOLCI, a logistic regression model including age, sex, race/ethnicity, ethnicity, insurance, and diagnoses. We evaluated model performance using Scaled Brier Scores (SBS; range -1 to 1; composite measures of calibration and discrimination), calibration plots, and c-statistics. ResultsAmong 116,749 Trinity patients with 154,063 encounters, 12,054 (10.3%) patients died within one year. Among 94,489 KPSC patients with 133,043 encounters, 16,872 (17.9%) died within one year. The SBS was -0.007 at Trinity and 0.178 at KPSC. Calibration was poor for both. Trinitys discrimination was acceptable/good (c-statistic 0.76, 95% CI 0.76-0.77), and KPSCs was good/very good (c-statistic 0.81, 95% CI 0.81-0.81). Model performance across subgroups was similar to the overall cohort. LimitationsDeath data were collected exclusively within Trinity and KPSC, risking outcome misclassification; several subgroup evaluations were limited by small sample sizes. ConclusionsAn external evaluation of the widely available Epic EOLCI demonstrated adequate to very good discrimination, poor calibration, and equitable performance across sociodemographic characteristics and diagnoses in two of the nations largest health systems. Primary funding sourcePCORI PLACER-2022C3-30553.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Hospital segregation, critical care strain, and inpatient mortality during the COVID-19 pandemic in New York City 95%
- Predicting patients with false negative SARS-CoV-2 testing at hospital admission: A retrospective multi-center study 95%
- Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes for 7,995 Patients with SARS-CoV-2 Infection 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Real-Time Electronic Health Record Mortality Prediction During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Prospective Cohort Study 97%
- Clinical Utility of Automatable Prediction Models for Improving Palliative and End-Of-Life Care Outcomes: Towards Routine Decision Analysis Before Implementation 96%
- Validation of a Derived International Patient Severity Algorithm to Support COVID-19 Analytics from Electronic Health Record Data 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- International Electronic Health Record-Derived COVID-19 Clinical Course Profiles: The 4CE Consortium 91%
- Novel clinical subphenotypes in COVID-19: derivation, validation, prediction, temporal patterns, and interaction with social determinants of health 91%
- Predicting critical state after COVID-19 diagnosis: Model development using a large US electronic health record dataset 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Models, components, and outcomes of palliative and end-of-life care provided to adults living at home: A systematic review of reviews 91%
- Unwelcome memento mori or best clinical practice? Community end-of-life anticipatory medication prescribing practice: a mixed methods observational study 90%
- Changing patterns of mortality during the COVID-19 pandemic: population-based modelling to understand palliative care implications 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- The performance of national COVID-19 ‘Symptom Checkers’: A comparative case simulation study 90%
- Measures of socioeconomic advantage are not independent predictors of support for healthcare AI: subgroup analysis of a national Australian survey 90%
- User Testing of a Diagnostic Decision Support System with Machine-assisted Chart Review to Facilitate Clinical Genomic Diagnosis 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.